Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-23-2015, 07:51 PM   #11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: West Michigan/Fort Myers
Posts: 3,927
Mitch do your homework but don't be afraid of the 340 hp thing. Sometimes I wished I had the 360 only because it comes with the 3000 Trans. In all honesty my 340 does everything I need it to do.
__________________

__________________
Phil57 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2015, 10:21 AM   #12
Senior Member
 
tmmar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Long Island (Nassau County), NY
Posts: 4,258
Mitch,
First of all- Congrats on your new Berkshire and welcome to the Forums! Hope you have many fun, memorable and trouble free trips with it!!
Also, listen to what Phil has to say. As he said, he is full timing in his coach and has a lot of experience with it. He, and the others here, are a great source of information. I had a 2008 with the 340hp engine and while I didn't tow anything, it handled all of my needs perfectly. I think that once you get over your 'buyers remorse', you will love the coach. Also, as far as keeping your coach in great condition, just look at the posts about the work FR does on coaches at the International Rally and that should convince you that they really stand behind their product.
Tom
__________________

__________________
Tom and Margaret
2014 Berkshire 390bh-60

tmmar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2015, 10:28 AM   #13
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Easley, South Carolina
Posts: 645
Quote:
Originally Posted by tmmar View Post
Mitch,
First of all- Congrats on your new Berkshire and welcome to the Forums! Hope you have many fun, memorable and trouble free trips with it!!
Also, listen to what Phil has to say. As he said, he is full timing in his coach and has a lot of experience with it. He, and the others here, are a great source of information. I had a 2008 with the 340hp engine and while I didn't tow anything, it handled all of my needs perfectly. I think that once you get over your 'buyers remorse', you will love the coach. Also, as far as keeping your coach in great condition, just look at the posts about the work FR does on coaches at the International Rally and that should convince you that they really stand behind their product.
Tom
Ahh yes Buyers Remorse, you hit the nail on the head. lol Thanks for your input. Would like to hear more about this International Rally and what FR does.

Joe
__________________
Joe & Lori

2014 Berkshire 390 RB-40
5456Mich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2015, 10:31 AM   #14
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Easley, South Carolina
Posts: 645
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phil57 View Post
Mitch do your homework but don't be afraid of the 340 hp thing. Sometimes I wished I had the 360 only because it comes with the 3000 Trans. In all honesty my 340 does everything I need it to do.
Phil whats the big difference between the transmission that comes with the 340 vs. the 360 ?

Joe
__________________
Joe & Lori

2014 Berkshire 390 RB-40
5456Mich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2015, 10:38 AM   #15
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: West Michigan/Fort Myers
Posts: 3,927
About 5000 lbs. Seriously that is it. The 3000 will handle a higher GCVW and a higher torque and HP. The 2500 is limited to 33000 GCVW and torque at 700 FP. The 2500 also has some diagnostics in board and the 2500 does not. Also with the 360hp and 3000 transmission you get a 19500 lb rear axle as opposed to a 17500 with the 2500. I'm sure there are other differences that others might share.
__________________
Phil57 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2015, 10:39 AM   #16
Senior Member
 
CAT-RN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 6,145
I have the FL model 2014. Little over a year now. I do have the 360 motor. Don't let that be an issue. The 340 be just fine.

Handling -ride & drive great. No over weight issues. Always around 9.5 to 10 MPH
Couple small issues. Frig (fixed by Whirpool) water heater will be a learning curve. Getting that figured out ----

I'd say do good PDI and go for it. Quite happy here.

Russell
__________________
CAT-RN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2015, 10:39 AM   #17
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: West Michigan/Fort Myers
Posts: 3,927
The 3000 allows you to tow 10000 lbs and the 2500 is 5000.
__________________
Phil57 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2015, 10:39 AM   #18
Senior Member
 
tmmar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Long Island (Nassau County), NY
Posts: 4,258
Joe,
As you can see from my signature area, I now have a 2014 Berkshire with the 360 hp engine. With the 340 hp engine, they put in an Allison 2500 transmission. With the 360 hp engine, it is an Allison 3000 transmission. The 3000 allows for a larger towing capacity. 5000 lbs for the 2500 and 10000 lbs for the 3000. I believe there is a sticker on the hitch that states the towing capacity but the hitches are all the same whether it says 5000 lbs or 10000 lbs.
Hope this helps.
Tom

I guess Phil and Russell type faster than I do! (LOL!!)
__________________
Tom and Margaret
2014 Berkshire 390bh-60

tmmar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2015, 11:36 AM   #19
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Home is where I park it
Posts: 1,503
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phil57 View Post
About 5000 lbs. Seriously that is it. The 3000 will handle a higher GCVW and a higher torque and HP. The 2500 is limited to 33000 GCVW and torque at 700 FP. The 2500 also has some diagnostics in board and the 2500 does not. Also with the 360hp and 3000 transmission you get a 19500 lb rear axle as opposed to a 17500 with the 2500. I'm sure there are other differences that others might share.
From what I've been told Phil, our units do indeed have a 19500 RA. Forest River purposely de-rates (on paper) to be able state 2K more lbs for the toad. The tranny should not "care" where the weight is located; F/A, R/A, toad.... makes no difference to the tranny so long as TOTAL of all three is under 33K lbs.

I know you've probably spent a lot more time researching this than I, so maybe the above is not correct, but the actual bill of materials for the R/A assembly on the 360 vs 340 are identical.

OBTW, a just plain FANTASTIC price for the unit. I would buy it myself RIGHT NOW, if I didn't already have a 2011. I purchase my 2011 on election day of 2012 for $125K. It had only the mileage to get it from Elkhart to Alvarado, TX (dealer) and then onto Salt Lake City. Purchased new and titled by another individual, but not taken out a single trip.

Finally, weigh it, weigh it, WEIGH IT. The sales man will not like that, but TOUGH!! If you still have the right to back out, and it is overweight, FORCE them to "make it right" or walk away. YMMV, but that's what I would think about. If you have to upgrade the unit yourself, I suspect about $6K would be the bill. Besides extra wear and tear by being overweight, you have the potential for legal issues if you're ever involved in an accident.


Boowho??
__________________
boowho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2015, 11:49 AM   #20
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: West Michigan/Fort Myers
Posts: 3,927
Boo I stand corrected. My only knowledge on the rear axle is what I was told by the manufacturer so I would say you have it correct.
__________________

__________________
Phil57 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
berkshire

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



» Virginia Campgrounds

Reviews provided by




ForestRiverForums.com is not in any way associated with Forest River, Inc. or its associated RV manufacturing divisions.


Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:47 AM.