Regarding USFS and State Parks ...
I find that good campground reviews are pretty hard to come by. Way too many generalities. I literally read things like, "Half of the sites were rocky and unlevel, but some are quite good." Umm, which ones? Which ones are terrible? Which ones are good? Then, there are random 6-7 pictures, but no detail about which sites those pictures depict. Or, "Our site was one of the four best in the park." Great, what site was that/where did you actually stay? Which were the other 3? And, so on. It's infuriating that people take the time to give so much information, but then fail on basic details that anchors the reviews to anything usable or actionable.
I've also been on forums that had campground review sections. But, these review sections just turn into "where should I go" discussions. Before long, it's just a mess of random discussions without true reviews ... granted, that speaks more to moderator discipline.
Still other review type sites allow for discussion, but then require a Facebook account to do so. I don't do Facebook, so I guess I can't donate my time to help make those sites even better.
I really like campsitephotos.com due to the site-by-site photos ... though there isn't much written description of the sites. Reserveamerica/reservation.gov have some site-by-site photos. Sometimes the campground itself has photos and descriptions (e.g., State Parks).
Googlemaps sometimes has 3D interactive views of the campgrounds and, at least, has good aerial views of the terrain and sites.
Youtube is getting much better, as people are recording drive-throughs of the campgrounds, complete with annotations about site numbers.
Good luck.
Quote:
Originally Posted by sherman12
[...] going to Tim Buck Too [...]
|
Is that near Timbuktu, or is Tim Buck Too a person?