|
|
01-13-2017, 09:49 AM
|
#21
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Southern, IL
Posts: 3,272
|
This thread is heading back into an older thread about Magic Towing Dust.
http://www.forestriverforums.com/for...led-49706.html
__________________
Bob & Michelle
2016 Ford F-250 Lariat 4x4
2017 Flagstaff Super Lite 526RLWS
|
|
|
01-13-2017, 09:53 AM
|
#22
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Maryland
Posts: 913
|
Human nature for people to automatically make assumptions on everyone else's behalf. Since this is a forum for towing travel trailers, the discussion is being driven through that prism, and there are valid concerns, but I don't think the towing and payload aspect makes it automatically a stupid idea to offer a diesel. There are thousands and thousands of pick up trucks on the road that have never, and will never tow an rv, boat, utility trailer, etc. A lot of people just like driving a pick up truck. For them, tow rating, pay load, etc, means nothing. If I'm a guy that wants a truck that gets really good fuel economy, and never intend to use it for anything other than picking up a couch from IKEA, a diesel is a better option. I certainly understand the argument that the true truck enthusiast scoff at the guy who treats his truck like its a car, but that's beside the point.
For me, I'm curious what the numbers will be when they are released. Fuel economy for the 2.7 Ecoboost versus the 3.5 Ecoboost versus the diesel. Fuel economy when comparing the 6 speed versus the 10 speed transmission in each engine option (as I understand it, both the 6 speed and 10 speed will be available with all 3 engines, but I could be wrong).
My biggest concern about adding a diesel option does relate to the above discussion about payload and towing capacity and everything else. Because I think there will be a lot of people that see gas versus diesel and make the leap that now my F150 can tow that 40' 5th wheel I've always wanted "cuz its a diesel". Second to that is the fear that all the RV dealers are going to use that very argument, "well of course you can tow that trailer, you've got a diesel". Many dealers already over state your vehicle's abilities as it is.
__________________
_________________________
2023 GMC Sierra 3500 Denali
2020 Cherokee Arctic Wolf 287BH
|
|
|
01-13-2017, 09:56 AM
|
#23
|
Oklahoma Proud
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: central OK
Posts: 2,784
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by KMP44
Right - but if you take an average half ton with a 1700-1800 lb payload and put a diesel in it, you add 600 pounds to the weight of the truck, which comes off the payload rating. Then you are at 1100-1200 lbs payload. Pretty light, especially for somebody thinking buying a diesel will give them big towing numbers. That's the knock on the Ram eco-diesel and the Titan. Like Miller Time said, these half ton diesels are really about better fuel economy - they aren't tow monsters like the one ton diesels are.
Not sure why Ford went with a diesel option after resisting the idea for so long. Must be they think there is a market for these.
|
A baby diesel isnt going to weigh 600 lb more, most likely. I bet its equivalent to a v8 gas in weight.
|
|
|
01-13-2017, 10:30 AM
|
#24
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 3,253
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MillerTime
A baby diesel isnt going to weigh 600 lb more, most likely. I bet its equivalent to a v8 gas in weight.
|
With a CGI block and aluminum heads, you're probably right about the engine itself. There will be additional weight in DEF and DPF systems, but I doubt it will be more than a couple hundred pounds.
|
|
|
01-13-2017, 10:39 AM
|
#25
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 10,833
|
All brands aside. Small Diesel engines in car would be great as well. They have many in Europe and they work just fine.
On to towing. Does anyone here know of the small D Max in the GM midsize truck that has towed with one?
The F 150 with further weight reductions in body and trim level can till have payload respectable and provide a good solution for contractors, service companies and even smaller delivery vehicles with long life durability and lower operating cost compared to larger vans or chassis style vehicles. The small power stroke might fit the niche market quit well.
__________________
B and B
2022 Venture RV SportTrek STT 302 VRB Travel Trailer
2018 Heartland Landmark 365 Louisville 5th Wheel
2015 Heartland Bighorn 5th Wheel
2013 FR Rockwood 8289WS 5th Wheel
2012 FR Rockwood 2703 SS Travel Trailer
|
|
|
01-13-2017, 01:02 PM
|
#26
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Between Pickles Gap and Toad Suck, AR
Posts: 6,070
|
__________________
"Next to prayer, fishing is the most personal relationship of man" Herbert Hoover
"American by Birth, Southern by the Grace of God"Lewis Grizzard
FROG AR-0019-242
2016 GMC Denali 3500Dually--2017 CC 36CKTS
|
|
|
01-13-2017, 01:14 PM
|
#27
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,106
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by KMP44
Not sure why Ford went with a diesel option after resisting the idea for so long. Must be they think there is a market for these.
|
Might be that the ecoboost was a bust?
__________________
Terry/Bernadette Lily the Yorkie 2019 Dodge Ram Sport 1500 2019 FR Vibe 28RL
|
|
|
01-13-2017, 01:44 PM
|
#28
|
Tom
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 386
|
Ecoboost a bust, I hardly doubt that. Not sure what planet your from.
|
|
|
01-13-2017, 02:15 PM
|
#29
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,106
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seachaser186
I wondering the same thing. My payload is 1830 with the 36 gal. tank. Somebody needs to do their homework.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seachaser186
Ecoboost a bust, I hardly doubt that. Not sure what planet your from.
|
A little testy aren't we?
If you read some of the literature on my planet, you will find that Ford has completely revised the ecoboost for 2018. Don't know about you but my take is that the "old" ecoboost needed a revision.
Nanoo, nanoo
__________________
Terry/Bernadette Lily the Yorkie 2019 Dodge Ram Sport 1500 2019 FR Vibe 28RL
|
|
|
01-13-2017, 02:35 PM
|
#30
|
Tom
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 386
|
So why is it a bust? The next gen is still going to be called an Ecoboost with more torque and horsepower.
|
|
|
01-13-2017, 02:37 PM
|
#31
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Between Pickles Gap and Toad Suck, AR
Posts: 6,070
|
I'm not a Ford guy nor a gearhead......but isn't ecoboost just a turbocharged engine?? Or is there more to it?
__________________
"Next to prayer, fishing is the most personal relationship of man" Herbert Hoover
"American by Birth, Southern by the Grace of God"Lewis Grizzard
FROG AR-0019-242
2016 GMC Denali 3500Dually--2017 CC 36CKTS
|
|
|
01-13-2017, 02:43 PM
|
#32
|
Tom
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 386
|
They have much higher torque at a lower rpm making them extremely popular in the towing community.
|
|
|
01-13-2017, 02:53 PM
|
#33
|
Georgia Rally Coordinator
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: GA
Posts: 24,488
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by B and B
All brands aside. Small Diesel engines in car would be great as well. They have many in Europe and they work just fine.
On to towing. Does anyone here know of the small D Max in the GM midsize truck that has towed with one?
.
|
Trailer life gave it it good Revue on towing in Cal mountains month or two ago. Later RJD
__________________
2020 Shasta Phoenix SPF 27RKSS (sold)
2018 Dodge Ram 2500 6.4 3:73 gearing.(sold) (sold) 2015 Chevy 2500 6.0, 4:10
Traded 2015 30WRLIKS V-Lite
Days camped 2019 62
Days camped 2020 49 days camped 2021-74 2022-40 days 2023 5 days
|
|
|
01-13-2017, 02:54 PM
|
#34
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Central New York
Posts: 1,165
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MillerTime
A baby diesel isnt going to weigh 600 lb more, most likely. I bet its equivalent to a v8 gas in weight.
|
Just doing a quick comparison on the Ram - Hemi vs eco diesel, it looks like the payload drops about 300 pounds. The crew cabs I was looking at had a payload of 1340 lbs. Regardless of whether its actual engine weight or something else dropping the payload - that would be a major drawback for me. People that own them seem very happy with them overall though.
__________________
2022 Columbus 379MBC (Previous 2013 Rockwood Roo 23 IKSS)
2023 F-350 (Previous 2017 F250, 2005 F-150)
|
|
|
01-13-2017, 08:17 PM
|
#35
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 10,833
|
My 2013 Eco Boost towed my current trailer just fine. I traded for A SuperDuty for more payload and better more stable towing.
I hardly think Eco Boost was a bad engine. I believe the negative comment was more a sign of the times on conjecture rather than facts.
__________________
B and B
2022 Venture RV SportTrek STT 302 VRB Travel Trailer
2018 Heartland Landmark 365 Louisville 5th Wheel
2015 Heartland Bighorn 5th Wheel
2013 FR Rockwood 8289WS 5th Wheel
2012 FR Rockwood 2703 SS Travel Trailer
|
|
|
01-13-2017, 08:21 PM
|
#36
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 10,833
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by KMP44
Just doing a quick comparison on the Ram - Hemi vs eco diesel, it looks like the payload drops about 300 pounds. The crew cabs I was looking at had a payload of 1340 lbs. Regardless of whether its actual engine weight or something else dropping the payload - that would be a major drawback for me. People that own them seem very happy with them overall though.
|
A buddy of mine has a hemibin his 1500 and is looking at payload of 1600 lbs after his cap, gear etc he has maybe 1100 left for towing. Add some gear to the Eco and you have less than a 1000 lbs. I talked him out of real world number vs the local Mopar Fiat sales rep saying he would be fine. He really wanted the diesel. Now his plans are to trade his 1500 for a 2500 Cummins next year on his 2007 1500.
__________________
B and B
2022 Venture RV SportTrek STT 302 VRB Travel Trailer
2018 Heartland Landmark 365 Louisville 5th Wheel
2015 Heartland Bighorn 5th Wheel
2013 FR Rockwood 8289WS 5th Wheel
2012 FR Rockwood 2703 SS Travel Trailer
|
|
|
01-13-2017, 09:03 PM
|
#37
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 103
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by WFD
He is referring to the payload of the F150...not the Super Duty! Article has to do with adding diesel to the F150 line.
|
Read my signature! My truck is an f150
__________________
2016 Coachmen Apex 288BHS
2015 F150 Sport 4x4 3.5 Eco Boost
|
|
|
01-13-2017, 09:03 PM
|
#38
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Western New York
Posts: 1,331
|
Some info on the 2018 F150 line up. All but the base V-6 will be with the 10 speed transmission. This is the 10 speed transmission that Ford & GM developed together.
Ford F-150 gets Power Stroke for 2018 | Medium Duty Work Truck Info
__________________
2014 Coachmen Pursuit 31BDP
2016 Ford C-Max Energi
1987 Chrysler LeBaron Convertible
FROG Member
FMCA Member #F438633 - Good Sam Life Member
Coachmens Owners Group Member
|
|
|
01-13-2017, 09:12 PM
|
#39
|
Oklahoma Proud
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: central OK
Posts: 2,784
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 4B11T
Read my signature! My truck is an f150
|
Fyi....those of us that use apps for frf cant see signatures that i guess are viewable on a computer screen.
Ive been using the app for 4.5 years on here and there are only about a dozen or so people that have app viewable signatures.
|
|
|
01-13-2017, 10:46 PM
|
#40
|
Site Team
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Grayson County, Texas
Posts: 21,587
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MillerTime
Fyi....those of us that use apps for frf cant see signatures that i guess are viewable on a computer screen.
Ive been using the app for 4.5 years on here and there are only about a dozen or so people that have app viewable signatures.
|
On the green FRF app and the orange Tapatalk app, you can touch a member's avatar and see his/her profile which has signature info. at the bottom.
__________________
2015 FR Wildcat 295RSX / GMC Sierra
Nights Camped: '13 = 49/'14 = 74/'15 = 74/'16 = 85/'17 = 110/'18 = 111/'19 = 86/'20 =108/'21 = 115/'22 = 135/'23 = 78; Booked for 2024 = 69
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|