|
09-05-2012, 01:42 PM
|
#1
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 553
|
Airlift 1000 are junk
Got back from my Labor Day trip to NC.
This was my first trip with the Airlift 1000 air bags in my Suburban. The trailer is a Surveyor Sport 189 - 20ft long, ~ 4200lbs loaded with a tongue weight of ~450lbs. I don't use WD on this little trailer. Manual says up to 600lbs OK without WD. Up to 1100lbs with.
In another thread, I described installing these bags. The are the kind that fit inside the rear coil spring (no leaf spings on this truck). I drove the truck around town inflated and they rode fine. When I hooked up the trailer, the rear sank only about an inch. Great.
Well, this past weekend, I took the trailer up to North Carolina. First, the truck felt like I was riding on marsh mellows. A very unsettling feeling. By the time I arrived in NC - about an hour - the air had leaked out completely - so the rear of the truck sagged more and thus the trailer was more tongue heavy and unlevel. I think the leaks are at the top of the bags - there is a barbed nipple the hose fits over, but the instructions don't show that you clamp over this. It's nearly impossible to reach with needle nose pliers to secure the hose. All the other connections have clamps. Can't hear or feel any leaking.
Even if I could get them to hold air, I don't like them. I now think the design of putting the bag inside the coil spring is flawed. The ride quality is very strange with a load on the back.
So I've ordered some Timbrens and will see if I like that better. Basically with the 2012 Suburban, the Airlift 1000 and the Timbrens are really your only choices. The Airlift 5000, Firestone and Hellwig show no choice for this truck. Look at the video of how the Timbrens work on thier home page. Was thinking they were just a big bump stop, but that is not correct. More like a helper spring.
Not really asking a question, more like a venting. If I can't get some reasonable towing performace out of this Suburban, it's gonna go.
|
|
|
09-05-2012, 01:50 PM
|
#2
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Shenandoah Valley of Virginia
Posts: 9,280
|
wincrasher, even though the manual says up to 600 lbs. without a WDH, why not try a WDH with your trailer ?? I betcha a WDH with integrated sway control, and 600 lb. spring bars will make all of the difference with the way you Burb handles the Surveyor.
__________________
Chap , DW Joy, and Fur Baby Sango
2017 F350 Lariat CCSB, SRW, 4x4, 6.7 PS
2017 Grand Design Reflection 337RLS
|
|
|
09-05-2012, 02:11 PM
|
#3
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 553
|
I have a setup I could use if I wanted to. It's just ridiculous to have to use that on this wee trailer.
On my bigger trailer, with the WD setup, the Suburban still drops like 4 inches, which is a problem that the Timbrens may help solve. The friction bar is adequate sway control for the 28' trailer.
I have come to terms with having to cruise at 60 mph with this truck with a trailer attached. I can keep the rpms below 3500 on steep hills. I can accept the low engine power, but not weird handling dynamics. What's laughable is that this truck is rated to tow 8100lbs! Never buy a TV strickly by the numbers. They say figures don't lie, but liars figure. Either GM is filled with liars, or these guys have trouble with math.
|
|
|
09-05-2012, 02:17 PM
|
#4
|
Mod free 5er
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Concord, NC
Posts: 24,702
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wincrasher
Got back from my Labor Day trip to NC.
In another thread, I described installing these bags. The are the kind that fit inside the rear coil spring (no leaf spings on this truck)...I think the leaks are at the top of the bags - there is a barbed nipple the hose fits over, but the instructions don't show that you clamp over this. It's nearly impossible to reach with needle nose pliers to secure the hose...
|
According to the instructions on page 6:
6. Push the air line onto the stem, covering all the barbs (fig. 7). With the pliers, slide the air line clamp upward until it fully covers the barbed section. fig. 7 shows the end of the bag with the barbed fitting and the hose and clamp.
Could it be that you might have missed this part of the installation?
__________________
|
|
|
09-05-2012, 02:24 PM
|
#5
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 553
|
Well, I'll have to go back and look. The only figure I remember was showing the bag in the coil with the space. I went thru it several times to find any indication of putting a clamp on the bag's nipple. I'll check the version you can download. Maybe it's different than what came in the box?
|
|
|
09-05-2012, 02:26 PM
|
#6
|
Mod free 5er
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Concord, NC
Posts: 24,702
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wincrasher
Well, I'll have to go back and look. The only figure I remember was showing the bag in the coil with the space. I went thru it several times to find any indication of putting a clamp on the bag's nipple. I'll check the version you can download. Maybe it's different than what came in the box?
|
Here is the manual I looked at.
http://www.autoaccessoriesgarage.com...tall/60769.pdf
__________________
|
|
|
09-05-2012, 02:37 PM
|
#7
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 553
|
I just looked at it online. When I was installing and looking at the instructions, I was thinking Fig 7 was related to the T connector, not the bags. Now I see what you are talking about. That should fix up the leak issue, but not the ride issue.
I filled the bags to 35 psi, then put on the trailer. Was that wrong too?
|
|
|
09-05-2012, 02:41 PM
|
#8
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Southeast Wisconsin
Posts: 6,949
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wincrasher
Either GM is filled with liars, or these guys have trouble with math.
|
Probably a little bit of both of those, plus the fact that the tests each manufacturer used or uses to calculate towing capacity are secret, proprietary, best-case scenarios and non-standardized.
Hopefully, this will be better with SAE J2807. Toyota started to use the new standard on some lines in 2011 and GM just did it this year. I don't think they published new numbers for the Suburban, though
Tow Ratings Adjust for 2013 GM Pickups
__________________
Scott
DW, 3 Kids and our Goldens
2012 Shamrock 233S
2008 Toyota Sequoia 5.7L 4WD
|
|
|
09-05-2012, 02:42 PM
|
#9
|
Mod free 5er
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Concord, NC
Posts: 24,702
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wincrasher
I just looked at it online. When I was installing and looking at the instructions, I was thinking Fig 7 was related to the T connector, not the bags. Now I see what you are talking about. That should fix up the leak issue, but not the ride issue.
I filled the bags to 35 psi, then put on the trailer. Was that wrong too?
|
It's different from what I do, I hook up and then fill the bags to the pressure I want based on about 15 yrs of using them with no problems. If you fill the bags first, when you put the load on them, they will automatically increase in pressure. In my case it is around 15#-20# which drastically changes the ride and handling.
__________________
|
|
|
09-05-2012, 02:46 PM
|
#10
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 553
|
I find the instructions confusing on this point. It says to inflate to 35, then apply the load. Yet also says 35 psi max. So you could be way over that with a load applied.
|
|
|
09-05-2012, 02:51 PM
|
#11
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 553
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Triguy
Probably a little bit of both of those, plus the fact that the tests each manufacturer used or uses to calculate towing capacity are secret, proprietary, best-case scenarios and non-standardized.
Hopefully, this will be better with SAE J2807. Toyota started to use the new standard on some lines in 2011 and GM just did it this year. I don't think they published new numbers for the Suburban, though
Tow Ratings Adjust for 2013 GM Pickups
|
The biggest problem with the Suburban is that it weighs over 3 tons! Even if the rating dropped 500lbs, that would still be too much weight for this truck. It just runs out of steam on the hills - maybe it would be fine in flatland. It's just hilarious that they advertise it pulling horse trailers and such. Maybe if you are entertained by an engine screaming at 5000 rpm going 35mph up a grade, you should get one of these. In fact, I know a guy that'd give you a great deal on one with low mileage.
|
|
|
09-05-2012, 03:14 PM
|
#12
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Southeast Wisconsin
Posts: 6,949
|
My wife gets to pick the next vehicle and she already thinks the Sequoia is too big to drive so we'll have to pass on that offer.
BTW - you're not the only one with a TV with an overblown rating. My Sequoia weighs about the same (3 tons) and was rated as something like 9,100lbs towing cap. Current models are a more realistic 7,100lbs. No changes to the truck as far as I can tell.
__________________
Scott
DW, 3 Kids and our Goldens
2012 Shamrock 233S
2008 Toyota Sequoia 5.7L 4WD
|
|
|
09-07-2012, 05:39 AM
|
#13
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 75
|
I went from a Escalade ESV to a Silverado DRW diesel 3500hd pulling the TT was night and day difference. I still use the wd bars mainly to take the weight off the tongue. My rear drops 1.5 inch when I drop the 950tw onto the hitch without the bars on. The front rises 3/4 inch which is negligible but I can feel the steering gets a little light but might just be my imagination.
__________________
TV: 2012 Silverado 3500HD DRW Duramax/Allison
FW: 2013 Sandpiper 365SAQ
|
|
|
09-07-2012, 12:34 PM
|
#14
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 360
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Triguy
Probably a little bit of both of those, plus the fact that the tests each manufacturer used or uses to calculate towing capacity are secret, proprietary, best-case scenarios and non-standardized.
Hopefully, this will be better with SAE J2807. Toyota started to use the new standard on some lines in 2011 and GM just did it this year. I don't think they published new numbers for the Suburban, though
Tow Ratings Adjust for 2013 GM Pickups
|
Not to go off topic but GM never implemented the numbers even though they did release them after Ford & Dodge reneged on the deal.
Opps, I stand corrected. The last info I saw was they were going to wait till Ford & Dodge were on board.
|
|
|
09-07-2012, 01:48 PM
|
#15
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1,337
|
so why not just pull it with your other truck?
__________________
2012 Rockwood 8293RKSS
2006 Dodge Ram 2500 5.9L Cummins Turbodiesel 4x4; 2012 Ford Escape 4x4. 3 very pampered cats.
Days camped: 2011: 61; 2012: 66 Days; 2013: 69;2014: 68 2015: 90 Days camped 2016: 34
|
|
|
09-07-2012, 02:17 PM
|
#16
|
Mod free 5er
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Concord, NC
Posts: 24,702
|
__________________
|
|
|
09-07-2012, 05:04 PM
|
#17
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 553
|
'cause when the world is your oyster, your trucks are not always on the same part of the country
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|