Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-01-2012, 09:39 PM   #21
Moderator Emeritus
 
MtnGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Shenandoah Valley
Posts: 9,274
In regards to RV Guys excellent explanation, I would much rather go with the unit with the increased GVWR over the lower GVWR, even if I were not going to load the camper beyond the lower GVWR limit. I am a firm believer that staying way under the GVWR is a positive thing regarding tire and axle problems. That is 1 reason we decided on a camper with a 3000+ lb. carrying capacity. Loaded for camping, even with a full water tank, we are still a ton under the GVWR trailer rating.
__________________

__________________

Chap , DW Joy, and Fur Baby Sango
2017 F350 Lariat CCSB, SRW, 4x4, 6.7 PS
2017 Grand Design Reflection 337RLS
MtnGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



» Virginia Campgrounds

Reviews provided by




ForestRiverForums.com is not in any way associated with Forest River, Inc. or its associated RV manufacturing divisions.


Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:48 PM.