Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-29-2014, 12:12 PM   #1
rbq
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: West Valley City, Utah
Posts: 320
fuel economy & speed-interesting article

Read an article from Click & Clack that was interesting. They shared the link to this article.
http:// http://www.bridgestonetrucktires.com/us_eng/real/magazines/ra_special-edit_4/ra_special4_fuel-speed.asp
__________________

__________________
2001 Chevy Silverado
2011 Rockwood Roo 233S
rbq is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2014, 12:33 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
SKnight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,428
From someone in the automotive world, this is an excellent article!
__________________

__________________
Now-2014 Sierra 346RETS 5er BUB
Then-2002 Keystone Springdale 286RLDS TT

Nights camped in 2014-28, 2015-127, 2016-10
SKnight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2014, 12:34 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Steeljag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Central, Fl.
Posts: 1,106
Good read.
__________________
2018 Forester 3011DS (Purchased 04/26/17)
2010 Flagstaff 26 RLSS (Sold 05/16)
2012 Ford F-150 Ecoboost, Screw, H/D, 3.73
1930 lbs CCC
2014 Jeep Rubicon JK
Going where the weather suits my clothes.
Steeljag is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2014, 12:35 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
BamaBob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Whereever our Berkshire is Parked!
Posts: 6,987
Hmmm...interesting article - looks like it is aimed towards semi drivers, but I suspect the basic math will transfer to RV drivers/draggers

So the bottom line is this from the article:
Increasing speed from 55 to 75 mph can increase fuel consumption by 39 percent, while cutting the effectiveness of fuel-efficient tires by 27 percent.

I'm not so sure I would want to pull my 5er at 75 anyway (65...yeah I do occasionally)
__________________
Bob & Anne-Marie [BamaBob & 6 Actual]
| 2017 Berkshire XLT 43A with Ultrasteer Tag | Blue Ox Avail + KarGard II |
| SMI AF-1 Air Brake | 2016 Jeep Cherokee Overland TOAD | Pedego Bikes |
Nights Camped: 2013 - 24 2014 - 42 2015 - 56 Jul 2016 - Fulltime
BamaBob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2014, 01:13 PM   #5
Camper Less Camping
 
Cajun Po-Boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: NW
Posts: 3,642
I need to have a talk to my Duramax...the heavier the load I ask it to tow...the faster it wants to roll down the highway...it's almost toying with me to make it break a sweat! ,)

Good article
__________________
2013 Sabre 32RCTS-6 (sold)
Family of 4 whose always on the GEAUX!
Cajun Po-Boy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2014, 09:37 AM   #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Long Island N.Y.
Posts: 419
Good article thanks for sharing
__________________
2013 Wildcat 323QB
08 Silverado Crew Cab 2500HD Duramax-Allison
Twin Honda 2000 campsite friendly generators
Nights camped in 2014 = 19
(2013 = 36)
(2012 = 42)
JFM-jr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2014, 09:50 AM   #7
Senior Member
 
Malco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Central Nova Scotia
Posts: 519
I always found I got the best fuel mileage at 90 to 100 kph.
__________________
2011 Salem 30kqbss
2013 Ram 2500
2005 Ram 2500
1968 Pontiac Le Mans
Malco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2014, 10:01 AM   #8
Senior Member
 
mark0224's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,443
Never new this but did find that driving 55 mph I gained a couple of miles per gallon, waiting to see how my new v lite does on the interstate at 65 mph.
__________________
mark0224 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2014, 11:48 AM   #9
Senior Member
 
WrongWayRandall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Lexington, Kentucky
Posts: 115
According to my logs (old habits die hard) my fuel economy is about %15 better at 65 than 72 in my daily driver sedan. Since we never break 65 with the camper attached to the truck I can't say on the 72-65 difference, but the difference between 55 and 65 is almost %15. Now, if we could just get rid of the crap they water the gas down with I'd get my %11 back from that too!

I also found the engine life/wear and tear factor, as well as that of the tires, an added incentive to slow it down a bit.

- Randy
__________________
1975 Westfalia (VW)
2014 Rockwood A122
WrongWayRandall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2014, 12:05 PM   #10
Site Team
 
acadianbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: St. Paul, Minnesota
Posts: 2,915
Air resistance is not a linear resistance. It works on the square of the speed. Double the speed; you get 4 times the air resistance. It takes 4 times as much energy to combat air resistance at 60 mph versus 30 mph. So, their graphs all make sense. It is easy to see how air resistance becomes the dominant factor as speed increases.
__________________

__________________
http://i421.photobucket.com/albums/pp297/acadianbob/IMG_2757.jpg
2012 F150 FX4 Ecoboost, 2016 Surveyor 274BHS
2003 Yamaha FJR1300, Demco Premiere Slider
1969 John Deere 1020, 1940 Ford 9N, 1948 Ford 8N
Jonsered 535, Can of WD-40, Duct Tape
Red Green coffee mugs
acadianbob is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



» Virginia Campgrounds

Reviews provided by




ForestRiverForums.com is not in any way associated with Forest River, Inc. or its associated RV manufacturing divisions.


Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:53 PM.