Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-02-2014, 12:11 PM   #41
Camper Less Camping
 
Cajun Po-Boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: NW
Posts: 3,642
Quote:
Originally Posted by steepgrade View Post
Jammer3025, Yes, it's a 2014 2500 4x4 6.7L cummins diesel.
It's an awesome truck! Congrats to you too
Great purchase...Once you go diesel, you'll never want to tow any other way! ENJOY!



__________________
2013 Sabre 32RCTS-6 (sold)
Family of 4 whose always on the GEAUX!
Cajun Po-Boy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2014, 12:27 PM   #42
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 3,253
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cajun Po-Boy View Post
Great purchase...Once you go diesel, you'll never want to tow any other way! ENJOY!
I tow with an Ecoboost now after having a 7.3 and a 6.7 PSD. I love the EB. No way I'd try pulling what I do with a NA V8, though. The 6.7 clearly pulled better, but was NOT happy putting around town and doing the short 3-5 mile drives that I do for the majority of my driving.
dustman_stx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2014, 12:42 PM   #43
CLT
Next Gen Camperbot 5000XL
 
CLT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 316
The new 2015 Expedition is going to be Ecoboost. Can't wait!
__________________
NO TV!!! NOW WHAT???
2014 Coachmen Apex 259BHSS
CLT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2014, 12:49 PM   #44
Senior Member
 
BuckeyeChuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: West Michigan
Posts: 506
Quote:
Originally Posted by oxcamper View Post
our F250 SuperDuty only has the 5.0 L -- what a DOG! Can't pull up hill unless the engine is reving at 4K + and the semi's are passing me. 9 mpg and I still have to open the driver's door and push with my foot!

First and last Ford truck I'll ever own.
Any brand of truck with that small of an engine will suck at towing not just Ford. Dont blame Ford for a poor choice of engine.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using Forest River Forums mobile app
__________________

2012 F250 Super Duty
2013 Sabre 33CKTS
BuckeyeChuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2014, 01:37 PM   #45
Senior Member
 
Steelframer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 211
It's not the truck that's the dog, it's the engine size. Not beating you up at all, I pull our 274 dbh with a jeep commander 5.7 that revs up to 4g also on steep hills and gets 9miles per G pulling through the bluffs of WI/Minn. That's what I have, That's what I can afford. No worries to the weight police, I'm under weight, and I've been a professional driver for eons.
Steelframer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2014, 06:50 PM   #46
Senior Member
 
BuckeyeChuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: West Michigan
Posts: 506
Quote:
Originally Posted by F and E Damp View Post
You're doing about average. My uncle in the UK towed a 5400-pound travel-trailer behind a 1.5 liter, 55 horse-power Austin sedan all over Europe for over 25 years. He got about 14 miles per Imperial gallon, which was about 1/3rd of what it got without the TT on the hitch.

Can you imagine what the weight police on the various forums would make of his exploits? The only time I saw anything even more improbable was when I was still in my teens. The family (Mom, Dad and three kids, including me) went "caravanning", towing a 23' Eccles TT behind our 1938 Austin 12 (1.6L L-head 4-banger, 40 horse-power on a good day). We were at a campground near Southampton (South coast of England, about in the middle) when a young couple pulled in. They were towing a 36' house trailer behind a 1949 L-head Morris Minor, which might have had 25 HP on its best day.

Turned out, he'd been laid off from a job on the north coast of Scotland and had landed a job in Southampton. The house trailer was their home and the Morris was their only vehicle, so they'd just hitched it up and hit the road.

He said they'd had to turn back a half-dozen times and find a route with easier grades, but they had made it all the way (over 400 miles) with no mishaps. When I hear folks ranting on about idiots in the US towing these "monster" 30' TTs behind puny little 6.8-liter V-10 pickups, I have to smile a bit.

FYI, my '03 Kia Sedona minivan is rated in the US for a 3500 pound max tow weight. The identical vehicle in the UK, with the same 4-speed automatic transmission and the same 3.5-L gasoline V-6 is rated to tow 3000 Kg (6600 pounds!) Can anyone explain the difference?
LOVE IT!!! Some people need a F350 Powerstroke Diesel to pull a 10 ft. Pop up.
__________________

2012 F250 Super Duty
2013 Sabre 33CKTS
BuckeyeChuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2014, 05:39 PM   #47
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 16
Quote:
Originally Posted by F and E Damp View Post
You're doing about average. My uncle in the UK towed a 5400-pound travel-trailer behind a 1.5 liter, 55 horse-power Austin sedan all over Europe for over 25 years. He got about 14 miles per Imperial gallon, which was about 1/3rd of what it got without the TT on the hitch.

Can you imagine what the weight police on the various forums would make of his exploits? The only time I saw anything even more improbable was when I was still in my teens. The family (Mom, Dad and three kids, including me) went "caravanning", towing a 23' Eccles TT behind our 1938 Austin 12 (1.6L L-head 4-banger, 40 horse-power on a good day). We were at a campground near Southampton (South coast of England, about in the middle) when a young couple pulled in. They were towing a 36' house trailer behind a 1949 L-head Morris Minor, which might have had 25 HP on its best day.

Turned out, he'd been laid off from a job on the north coast of Scotland and had landed a job in Southampton. The house trailer was their home and the Morris was their only vehicle, so they'd just hitched it up and hit the road.
,
He said they'd had to turn back a half-dozen times and find a route with easier grades, but they had made it all the way (over 400 miles) with no mishaps. When I hear folks ranting on about idiots in the US towing these "monster" 30' TTs behind puny little 6.8-liter V-10 pickups, I have to smile a bit.

FYI, my '03 Kia Sedona minivan is rated in the US for a 3500 pound max tow weight. The identical vehicle in the UK, with the same 4-speed automatic transmission and the same 3.5-L gasoline V-6 is rated to tow 3000 Kg (6600 pounds!) Can anyone explain the difference?
This post was so refreshing for me. Im towing a 26' with a Tacoma. Im within all the weight limits, but I get treated like a mass murderer who is going to kill his family along with everyone else on the road around me, on all the forums. It made me so paranoid I was afraid to hitch up the first few weeks after purchasing my TT.
zackbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2014, 05:45 PM   #48
Mod free 5er
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Concord, NC
Posts: 24,702
Quote:
Originally Posted by zackbo View Post
This post was so refreshing for me. Im towing a 26' with a Tacoma. Im within all the weight limits, but I get treated like a mass murderer who is going to kill his family along with everyone else on the road around me, on all the forums. It made me so paranoid I was afraid to hitch up the first few weeks after purchasing my TT.
No surprise, the wt police believe if you tow anything over 20' you need at least a 1T or 1.5T and anything over 28' you need a Peterbilt, Mack or Kenworth otherwise you will injure everyone, be a hazard on the highways and be liable for lawsuits out the yingyang.
__________________
OldCoot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2014, 08:18 AM   #49
Senior Member
 
BuckeyeChuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: West Michigan
Posts: 506
Quote:
Originally Posted by OldCoot View Post
No surprise, the wt police believe if you tow anything over 20' you need at least a 1T or 1.5T and anything over 28' you need a Peterbilt, Mack or Kenworth otherwise you will injure everyone, be a hazard on the highways and be liable for lawsuits out the yingyang.
Amen, brother!!

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using Forest River Forums mobile app
__________________

2012 F250 Super Duty
2013 Sabre 33CKTS
BuckeyeChuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2014, 09:42 PM   #50
Anacortesians
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Anacortes, WA
Posts: 1,166
Zackbo:

Glad you liked my story. My Aunt and Uncle were avid TT users. They belonged to the "Caravan Club" in the UK (caravan being the term for travel trailers over there) and were out almost every weekend to a rally somewhere in the UK. Uncle finlly got fed up of the performance on the 55HP Austin and went really wild and got a 2-liter, 90 HP TV! They went all over Europe with both TVs, towing a fairly heavy 18' TT and they loved it. Sure, it was a bit slow in the Alps, but they got there!

My current family car is a Kia Sedona, 3.5L V-6. It's limited in the US to a max tow weight of 3500 pounds. In the UK (and I think in Europe), it's rated to tow 3000 Kg (6600 pounds).

Most serious TT folks in the UK tow with Land Rovers and Range Rovers. I remember going to rallies with my Uncle's family and seeing the old 2-liter short-wheelbase Land Rovers towing 28-foot TTs (not very quickly, I must admit).

On one occasion, we were on vacation near Southampton when a family pulled in, towing a 32' park-model trailer behind a 1950 Morris Minor. The trailer was their family home and the Dad has been laid off from a job on the north coast of Scotland and had landed a job near Southampton.

The Morris was their only car, so they'd rigged a towing bracket and moved the mobile home close to 600 miles. That old car had an L-head 950cc engine which probably put out 30 horsepower on a good day. It's hard to imagine the trials they suffered.

I think there's some sort of conspiracy in the US to con TT owners into running much too thirsty vehicles to tow their trailers.
__________________
Frank and Eileen
No longer RVers or FR owners
F and E Damp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2014, 09:48 PM   #51
Senior Member
 
SKnight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,428
Quote:
Originally Posted by F and E Damp View Post

I think there's some sort of conspiracy in the US to con TT owners into running much too thirsty vehicles to tow their trailers.
Yes, there is. It's called litigation and is organized by lawyers.
__________________
Now-2014 Sierra 346RETS 5er BUB
Then-2002 Keystone Springdale 286RLDS TT

Nights camped in 2014-28, 2015-127, 2016-10
SKnight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2014, 09:54 PM   #52
Mod free 5er
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Concord, NC
Posts: 24,702
Quote:
Originally Posted by SKnight View Post
Yes, there is. It's called litigation and is organized by lawyers.
You forgot the FRF Weight Police.
__________________
OldCoot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2014, 10:57 PM   #53
Senior Member
 
SKnight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,428
Quote:
Originally Posted by OldCoot View Post
You forgot the FRF Weight Police.
That's an independently franchised subsidiary!
__________________
Now-2014 Sierra 346RETS 5er BUB
Then-2002 Keystone Springdale 286RLDS TT

Nights camped in 2014-28, 2015-127, 2016-10
SKnight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2014, 12:05 PM   #54
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 3,092
Quote:
Originally Posted by F and E Damp View Post
Zackbo:

I think there's some sort of conspiracy in the US to con TT owners into running much too thirsty vehicles to tow their trailers.
It's not a conspiracy. There is a huge difference between towing on the back roads of eastern North Carolina or South Carolina and going from San Francisco to Lake Tahoe in the traffic on I-80, or even worse, going across the Rockies in Colorado on I-70.

I've been there with under-powered and under-cooled and under-equipped tow vehicles. I've also had my transimission seize up from over-heating while on the upgrade to the Eisenhower tunnel (elevation 11K) on I-70 in Colorado. I've nearly had a 5000lb sailboat roll sideways off the trailer when the sway got too violent coming down an overpass in Florida - bent the trailer cradles pretty good.

Having learned the hard way (why I can't learn from other people's mistakes is something I have to change), I've found towing within recommended limits avoids those white-knuckle moments, having to change my underwear so frequently, and is a lot easier on the wallet long term (no unexpected breakdowns).

I have a 2008 Hyundai Entourage minivan (rebadged Kia Sedona) with the US 3500lb tow rating. I tow a FR A122 (base model, no front storage or toy area) in Colorado - about 2500 lbs actual. I had to install a WDH to make the ride comfortable and safe for the family, and ensure I didn't have sway when I had to maintain highway speeds in traffic. I wouldn't want to go anything heavier with that particular tow vehicle - but then I want to be able to maintain 50+ MPH going up the grades (on the straights) at 9000ft so that I'm not blocking traffic excessively.

As an engineer, I think the real reason for the reduced US ratings is the speeds (and associated stresses and strains on TV frame, suspension, brakes, engine) expected by US drivers in hilly and mountain areas. For living in the Rockies, I find the US tow ratings to be entirely reasonable - and NOT to be exceeded.

A question for the experts. I was in a Ford dealership a few months ago, eyeing the new Explorer. I noticed the footnote that said the Eco-boost engines were rated based on premium (92 octane) gas. Do they run well on regular? Or is premium needed to run decently because of the turbos?

Fred W
pgandw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2014, 08:40 PM   #55
Senior Member
 
B and B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 10,833
Send a message via AIM to B and B
I am too use regular in Canada on my Ecoboost. I do put premium in when my favourite filling station is selling it for regular price when they run out of regular.
__________________
B and B
2022 Venture RV SportTrek STT 302 VRB Travel Trailer
2018 Heartland Landmark 365 Louisville 5th Wheel
2015 Heartland Bighorn 5th Wheel
2013 FR Rockwood 8289WS 5th Wheel
2012 FR Rockwood 2703 SS Travel Trailer
B and B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2014, 09:13 PM   #56
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Saskatchewan, Canada
Posts: 292
Quote:
Originally Posted by oxcamper View Post
our F250 SuperDuty only has the 5.0 L -- what a DOG! Can't pull up hill unless the engine is reving at 4K + and the semi's are passing me. 9 mpg and I still have to open the driver's door and push with my foot!

First and last Ford truck I'll ever own.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BuckeyeChuck View Post
Any brand of truck with that small of an engine will suck at towing not just Ford. Dont blame Ford for a poor choice of engine.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using Forest River Forums mobile app
The 2010 F250 never had a 5.0L engine. It had the 5.4L and 6.8L gassers and the 6.4L diesel.

To the original question, I've averaged about 9.5 mpg in the 3 years with my setup below.
__________________

2011 F150 SuperCrew 5.0 4x4
2012 Flagstaff 27BESS
pappcam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2014, 09:59 PM   #57
Senior Member
 
another_newfie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 684
I run regular towing or not. I've tried premium and while it does make a difference not enough to justify the cost differential for me.

FWIW I've pulled my 5'r up and down the mountains of V and VW without once feeling like I was underpowered or undertrucked. To each their own though.
__________________
2015 F-350 SRW 6.7 PSD
2014 Crusader 295RST

1 Fantastic DW
1 Amazing DD
1 Beagle that will be missed (RIP Zeus)
another_newfie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2014, 06:25 AM   #58
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 157
My truck is an 03 Duramax. Pulling this enclosed snowmobile trailer 6,500# fully loaded, I would get 14mpg HWY. Cruise set to maintain 1850 rpm (66MPH). Notice how narrow it is, with an extreme "V" nose. This trailer never broke any air for itself. It rode in the slipstream of the truck.



Fast forwaed to the Work and Play I'm pulling now, same RPM (speed), 10 mpg. It wieghts 11,000#, and does push a lot of air. I washed dead bugs off of the front panel, after the last trip. I never had any dead bugs on the red trailer.
036.6turbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2014, 09:09 AM   #59
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 22
Some of y'all are getting great mpg for the load you're hauling.
I will have to see if I can tweak my driving habits to get better mpg.
steepgrade is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
23fb, f150


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


» Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by

Disclaimer:

This website is not affiliated with or endorsed by Forest River, Inc. or any of its affiliates. This is an independent, unofficial site.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:21 PM.