Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-14-2017, 06:37 PM   #81
Site Team
 
bikendan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Goodyear, Arizona
Posts: 33,779
He's got to be talking KMs.
__________________
Dan-Retired California Firefighter/EMT
Shawn-Musician/Entrepreneur/Wine Expert
and Zoe the Wonder Dog(R.I.P.)
2016 PrimeTime TracerAIR 255, pushing a 2014 Ford F150 SCREW XTR 4x4 3.5 Ecoboost w/Max Tow Package
4pt Equal-i-zer WDH and 1828lbs of payload capacity
bikendan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2017, 06:46 PM   #82
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 321
Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2729.jpg
Views:	122
Size:	409.7 KB
ID:	148227
carlsbad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2017, 06:47 PM   #83
Senior Member
 
Palinduff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Posts: 349
Quote:
Originally Posted by CP3 View Post
Not saying you're lying and I see you're in Canada so are those figures in MPG? I have a '13 crew cab FX4 (maybe your truck is 2wd?) and am lucky to get 16 empty at 80mph and 8 mpg towing my 7.5k loaded TT. Those figures you posted are by far the highest I've ever seen someone post from any F150. Hell thats almost better than my wife's '13 2wd pathfinder. Just wondering if I'm missing something.
I just got 23 l/100 km (10.3 mpg US) towing my 8500lb 5th wheel with a 1000lb of utility trailer and quad behind that. I was traveling at 55 to 60 mph. I get over 20mpg (US) on the highway traveling empty at 116km/hr 72mpg (I've got 24 at 60mph). You aren't going to get good mileage at 80mph.
__________________
2017 F150 XLT 3.5l Eco Boost, SC, 8' Box, 4X4
Max Tow (10 speed, 3:73, 11,700lbs), HD Payload (2440lbs)
2015 Puma 253 FBS
2013 Hyundai Santa Fe
2000 Honda EX 400, Rad Rover 6 Plus
Palinduff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2017, 06:53 PM   #84
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 735
Best MPG I ever got with my 3.5 Ecoboost.

Click image for larger version

Name:	95.8 MPG.jpg
Views:	114
Size:	214.9 KB
ID:	148228
madmaxmutt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2017, 06:57 PM   #85
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 832
With no traffic and a straight run of 28 miles to work I can get 22mpg. With traffic and stop and go it drops to 18 or so. When it gets NEAR the trailer it gets 9 or 10. I have a 3.55 rear. The gas mileage actually dropped when I got the K02's.

Truth be told, if I was in a different situation (I am recently retired but still needing a reasonable daily driver while doing referral work for a defense contractor) I'd probably bag the EB and shop for a nicely outfitted F250.

Marty
__________________
2016 Rockwood 2703WS Sapphire
2016 F250 SD 6.2L
Martsing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2017, 07:57 PM   #86
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 1
I have 2013 ecoboost, 4x4, 3.73, with 6.5' bed; pulls great. I have a 2017 flagstaff 27BHWS around 6700lbs dry. With my family (6 in all) and all our stuff we average around 7.5-8mpg. What are you guys see?
Longboardben is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2017, 09:53 PM   #87
CP3
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 40
Exactly that. Along with coolant temps pushing 240 if I try to keep it at 65-70.
__________________
2016 Cherokee 274DBH
2013 Ford F-150 FX4 Ecoboost Max Tow
Husky Centerline HD
CP3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2017, 07:08 AM   #88
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Greensboro NC
Posts: 1,140
Quote:
Originally Posted by bikendan View Post
He's got to be talking KMs.
Yea that would put him in the 12-14 MPG range, much more believable.
ronheater70 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2017, 07:34 AM   #89
Senior Member
 
Semperfi24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Maryland
Posts: 912
I guess I don't understand how people get such poor gas mileage with their ecoboost. There has to be some behavior that some do and others dont. On a recent 240 mile trip (mostly highway) I got 24mpg running 65-70. Over the course of a tank of fuel, mixing in stop and go traffic, highway, backroads, etc, I have never been under 20. I have the 3.55 gears. Do you just keep your foot on the pedal at all times? If you are spooling the turbos you are burning gas. If I'm on the highway driving 65 (just as an example), I am pressing the throttle probably 1 out of every 3 seconds, and even then I'm barely putting any input into the throttle. Once I am up to speed the truck has a tendency to just go without a much throttle input. The only reason I bring this up is because for a long time the common thought was that using cruise control is better for fuel economy, but I have found that using cruise on my ecoboost kills my fuel economy, and I suspect it is based on throttle input. Maybe its just a coincidence, not sure
__________________

_________________________
2023 GMC Sierra 3500 Denali
2020 Cherokee Arctic Wolf 287BH
Semperfi24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2017, 08:02 AM   #90
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Greensboro NC
Posts: 1,140
Quote:
Originally Posted by Semperfi24 View Post
I guess I don't understand how people get such poor gas mileage with their ecoboost. There has to be some behavior that some do and others dont. On a recent 240 mile trip (mostly highway) I got 24mpg running 65-70. Over the course of a tank of fuel, mixing in stop and go traffic, highway, backroads, etc, I have never been under 20. I have the 3.55 gears. Do you just keep your foot on the pedal at all times? If you are spooling the turbos you are burning gas. If I'm on the highway driving 65 (just as an example), I am pressing the throttle probably 1 out of every 3 seconds, and even then I'm barely putting any input into the throttle. Once I am up to speed the truck has a tendency to just go without a much throttle input. The only reason I bring this up is because for a long time the common thought was that using cruise control is better for fuel economy, but I have found that using cruise on my ecoboost kills my fuel economy, and I suspect it is based on throttle input. Maybe its just a coincidence, not sure
There are way to many variables to ever have direct comparisons in fuel economy amongst different users. Elevation, roads, tire pressure, tire size cab configuration, accessories,gearing, temperature, maintenance,driving habits, etc all play into it. It is perfectly normal for one person to get 18 MPG and another to get 22 MPG with the same truck.

I can compare my 2500 Ram with the 6.4 to My Ecoboost because pretty much all variables are the same with the exception of the truck itself. I Drive the same roads, pull the same loads, etc..
My Ecoboost would pull 22.??? heading to FLA from NC with me, wife and two daughters and all our gear for a week a Disney and the AC running.

AL the variables the same, going to visit family in WV I could typically see 17.5-18 MPG because its one frecon interstate hill after another.
ronheater70 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2017, 08:33 AM   #91
Senior Member
 
lesptr's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 1,051
We had a 2013 FX4 3.55 axle and averaged 16 mpg mixed highway and city. We traded it for a 15 F350 6.7 which gets 15 mpg mixed highway and city driving. My wife missed the 150 so much, we recently acquired a 2014 Platinum 3.73 axle for her to use as a daily driver. Unfortunately, in the same driving conditions, she is getting an average of 14 mpg.
(All of the above are shortbed 4X4's)

I hear about others getting significantly better mileage and wonder, what in the heck arevwe doing wrong?
__________________
2017 Coachman Chaparral 336TSIK
2015 F350 6.7
lesptr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2017, 08:44 AM   #92
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Syracuse
Posts: 43
The 3.5 Eco is a reliable, power breathing monster. Its true the first couple years of the engine had some isolated problems but the later years it's rock solid. I just traded my 3 1/2 year old 2014 F-150 3.5 EB with 3.73s at 42k miles. The entire time I didn't have to do anything other than put gas, change the oil, and rotate the tires. I always ran premium as Ford even stated that the motor could pull up to 20 additional hp on higher octane fuel.

Traded up last week to a '17 F-250 PSD due to the limited cargo capacity, a problem caused when we traded up to a newer, heavier TT this spring. I can only hope the PSD gives me the same trouble-free years that the EB gave me.
__________________
New to Forest River Products
2017 Salem Cruise Lite 272RBXL.
Shackrat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2017, 08:46 AM   #93
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 643
Quote:
Originally Posted by CP3 View Post
Not saying you're lying and I see you're in Canada so are those figures in MPG? I have a '13 crew cab FX4 (maybe your truck is 2wd?) and am lucky to get 16 empty at 80mph and 8 mpg towing my 7.5k loaded TT. Those figures you posted are by far the highest I've ever seen someone post from any F150. Hell thats almost better than my wife's '13 2wd pathfinder. Just wondering if I'm missing something.
I get 24-25 mpg on the hwy at 70 mph with my 2.7L Ecoboost. If I keep it under 65 mph on the hwy I've had as high as 27 mpg. Around town I see between 20-21 mpg sometimes 22. It drops a lot when towing due to the sail. There I see 10-13 mpg depending upon driving conditions. This is compared to my old 2001 Explorer which was pretty much 18-20 mpg whether on the hwy or in town. It got 9-12 mpg towing.
keith_h is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2017, 08:48 AM   #94
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 321
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shackrat View Post
The 3.5 Eco is a reliable, power breathing monster. Its true the first couple years of the engine had some isolated problems but the later years it's rock solid. I just traded my 3 1/2 year old 2014 F-150 3.5 EB with 3.73s at 42k miles. The entire time I didn't have to do anything other than put gas, change the oil, and rotate the tires. I always ran premium as Ford even stated that the motor could pull up to 20 additional hp on higher octane fuel.



Traded up last week to a '17 F-250 PSD due to the limited cargo capacity, a problem caused when we traded up to a newer, heavier TT this spring. I can only hope the PSD gives me the same trouble-free years that the EB gave me.


The 6.7 should give you years of dependable service. I drove a new one and compared to my 6.0 it was night and day. I have a '16 3.5 F150. If I ever get 5W I would look at the 6.7 SD.
carlsbad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2017, 08:55 AM   #95
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 643
Quote:
Originally Posted by Semperfi24 View Post
I guess I don't understand how people get such poor gas mileage with their ecoboost. There has to be some behavior that some do and others dont. On a recent 240 mile trip (mostly highway) I got 24mpg running 65-70. Over the course of a tank of fuel, mixing in stop and go traffic, highway, backroads, etc, I have never been under 20. I have the 3.55 gears. Do you just keep your foot on the pedal at all times? If you are spooling the turbos you are burning gas. If I'm on the highway driving 65 (just as an example), I am pressing the throttle probably 1 out of every 3 seconds, and even then I'm barely putting any input into the throttle. Once I am up to speed the truck has a tendency to just go without a much throttle input. The only reason I bring this up is because for a long time the common thought was that using cruise control is better for fuel economy, but I have found that using cruise on my ecoboost kills my fuel economy, and I suspect it is based on throttle input. Maybe its just a coincidence, not sure
I have found that my mpg can take a big hit in local driving if the engine never has a chance to warm up. The drop is more than I saw in my older vehicles which also had V6 engines. For me it occurs if I am making a lot of one or two mile trips when I stay around the house.
keith_h is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2017, 11:11 AM   #96
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 321
3.5 Ecoboost.
Regular gas.
1891' elevation gain.
Cruise control: 67
Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2731.jpg
Views:	111
Size:	317.1 KB
ID:	148291
carlsbad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2017, 05:51 PM   #97
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 142
They are wonderful. You should buy two! Runs like a rabbit up through the Rockies with a a family of 5 on board and 9,000 lbs on the back.
bruane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2017, 06:51 AM   #98
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Western Maryland
Posts: 25
I own a 2017 3.5 EcoBoost (Max Tow Pkg) and tow a trailer weighing approx 6,100 pounds. A very solid platform. The truck is super quiet at highway speed has gobs of smooth power and torque. Effortless towing. No negative issues thus far.
__________________
2017 Chevy 2500HD, 6.0, 4:10 Gears
2019 Flagstaff 26FKBS
Steve52 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2017, 07:14 AM   #99
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 5,712
Want it ? Then go buy it.
TheWolfPaq82 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2017, 07:59 PM   #100
Senior Member
 
LTnTN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 242
Quote:
Originally Posted by dbledan View Post
I have the 3.5litre EB with 3.55 gearing.

I got 20 mpg once all highway on a long trip not towing no wind.
I struggle to get 14 in the city and mixed driving usually 13 and change.
Towing I get on average 8 over the whole trip.

My buddy with the 2.7 litre EB can get 20 easy not towing but I am not close.


I've got the same drivetrain in my crew cab 4x4 and have been getting 19.8-20.3 mpg going back and forth between southeast Tennessee and north central North Carolina (435 miles each way). It actually has a towing tune installed that has it at 415 HP/445 ft lbs on 87 octane.

Towing the 5'er (8700 lbs) over the same 435 mile trip, it averaged 8.9 mpg. The route I take is up the Smokey Mountain Expressway into Asheville, then east on I-40, where there's a few 6-7% grades.

Braking is the only weak link on my setup. I've upgraded to heavier duty rotors and ceramic pads which has helped with the warped rotors I was experiencing.
LTnTN is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
ecoboost, ford

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


» Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by

Disclaimer:

This website is not affiliated with or endorsed by Forest River, Inc. or any of its affiliates. This is an independent, unofficial site.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:52 PM.