Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-17-2012, 05:38 PM   #11
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 117
Originally Posted by Glenn5995 View Post
Very impressive! As long as the conversion was well done and it proves to be dependable, I believe you made a wise choice. However, I have to ask why you did not at least have an option 4 to consider? You attribute the poor performance to the gearing. It would seem one consideration would have been swapping to 4.10s or 4.56s. Just wondering.

It looks good. I hope it serves you well for many years.

The history of these conversions has shown that the dependability is a direct corelation to the donor truck not the act of the conversion itself. It amazed me how easily integrated the diesel system was. If fact they refer to it as an integration, not a conversion.

Gearing was not an option for us because it is our daily driver. Lower gears would have reduced already poor mpg numbers. Also, we effectively reduced the milage of the vehicle by 83k miles taking this route, regearing would have still left us with 140k mile truck, over all dependability and life expectancy was a major factor as well.

HAARubicon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2012, 08:58 PM   #12
Senior Member
RattVader's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 219
Yep,once ya get addicted to Diesel,you'll never go back!!!


Steve & Sue
2011 Crusader 320RLT
2008 Dodge Ram 3500 (CTD) DRW 4x4
RattVader is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

» Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by is not in any way associated with Forest River, Inc. or its associated RV manufacturing divisions.

Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:47 AM.