Originally Posted by herk7769
John you are right!
I found my original multi-battery hookup graphic and it is very different than the one that Triguy used. That extra ground terminal connection threw me. Teach ME to drink wine at lunch and interpret circuits!
Well Lou, you are right too!
After a glass of ---- (drink), it became even
more obvious that the upper picture is actually
a schematic and the bottom a PHYSICAL layout.
I can think of three ways the upper schematic
can be implemented physically:
1) As you and Triguy said, the bottom pix *could*
be the physical implementation of the top pix.
2) It *could* be implemented as I suggested.
3) If you want to be really, really anal, you can
take the top pix as a PHYSICAL layout that has
the load connected to a pair of JUNCTIONS. Each
junction having two leads to the plus of both
banks (same for negative junction).
That top pix is really misleading rather than
informative like the bottom pix - and the one
you posted with three banks.
Now *MY* brain hurts.........