Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-16-2017, 09:11 AM   #261
Jeffco, MO
 
tedstr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Cedar Hill, MO
Posts: 143
Had a 3/4 ton gasser when I first got my Silverback. Got an average of 7 to 7.5 mpg. Now with with my diesel I get an average of 11 mpg, only a 50% increase in mileage. Also the diesel is more powerful on hills. Check the math and you will have your answer and comfort feeling.
__________________

Mary & Ted
2016 Silverback 33IK
2015 GMC Sierra 2500HD CrewCab Diesel/Super Glide Hitch
Days camped 09 -53, 10 -56, 11 -57, 12 - 55, 13 - 46, 14 - 50, 15 - 60, 16 -32
7 FROG Rallies (Goshen(4), Charleston, Amana(2))
tedstr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2017, 10:38 AM   #262
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 147
FWIW- I would never try and argue that a gasser would pull as well as a diesel, but a gasser in the right application will perform the task needed. I think the real argument is the cost factor gas vs. diesel. Most major fleet buyers, Paramount Pictures, US Marines, SoCal Edison, just a few that I have personal seen are going away from diesels due to the added cost of owning them. I wonder how many modern diesel owners are planning to dump them when the warranty is over because of the potential for a vey expensive out of warranty repair. If you go to the FTE – Ford Truck Enthusiast website you can search and find articles supporting these conclusions. A modern day diesel that has a repair can costs into the thousands of dollars very quickly for things like Turbo’s, Injectors, Fuel Pump, Exhaust Filters. My next-door neighbor’s 2014 Powersroke lost its Turbo at 120,000, out of warranty and it was a $5,500 repair bill. You could replace and entire engine in a gasser for that amount. I always hear the argument that people who by gassers are always trying to justify their purchase because of finances, Yep that is true, I don’t want to pay $8,000 more for a truck that is going to cost me more to maintain over the life of the truck. The argument that the mileage makes up for it is pure BS. My neighbor’s truck gets 3-4 mpg better than mine pulling the same weight trailer. With diesel prices in my area 40cents higher than gas, the better mileage factor is not realistic. Do some reading on the FTE site and see for yourself. The diesel side is a daily deluge of issues, the 6.2 gasser side is actually boring.
Lundy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2017, 10:42 AM   #263
Senior Member
 
BandJCarm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Between Pickles Gap and Toad Suck, AR
Posts: 6,070
If all the aspects of camping are to be reduced to a cost benefit analysis, no one would ever camp.

Just get the absolute best you can afford to get, and roll down the road.
__________________
"Next to prayer, fishing is the most personal relationship of man" Herbert Hoover
"American by Birth, Southern by the Grace of God"Lewis Grizzard

FROG AR-0019-242
2016 GMC Denali 3500Dually--2017 CC 36CKTS
BandJCarm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2017, 11:29 AM   #264
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 10,907
Quote:
Originally Posted by tedstr View Post
Had a 3/4 ton gasser when I first got my Silverback. Got an average of 7 to 7.5 mpg. Now with with my diesel I get an average of 11 mpg, only a 50% increase in mileage. Also the diesel is more powerful on hills. Check the math and you will have your answer and comfort feeling.
You're pulling a 14,000 lb 5ver with a diesel. I'm pulling a 6,500 lb TT with a gasser.

Did the math - I don't NEED a diesel for what I'm doing.

I COULD mow my 1/2 acre with one of these:


But I think my JD D130 is more appropriate:
__________________
1988 Coleman Sequoia - popup (1987-2009) - outlasted 3 Dodge Grand Caravans!
2012 Roo19 - hybrid (2012-2015)

2016 Mini Lite 2503S - tt (2015 - ???)
2011 Traverse LT, 3.6L, FWD
2009 Silverado 1500 Ext Cab, 5.3L, 4x4, 3.73
2016 Silverado 2500HD Dbl Cab, 6.0L 4x4, 4.10
rockfordroo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2017, 11:39 AM   #265
Senior Member
 
Ejs4029's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Denver, NC
Posts: 2,633
The last time I checked a hammer can still crack an egg....My decision to buy a diesel was based on wants not needs....And I have to chuckle when someone tells me or suggests I don't need a diesel to tow my 8K...Buy what makes you a Happy Camper
__________________
2015 Ram 2500 CTD,CC,SB,4x4
2016 Rockwood 2703 Emerald Edition
Husky CenterLine TS Hitch
TST 507 TPMS
Progressive Industries EMS-PT30X
Ejs4029 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2017, 11:53 AM   #266
Senior Member
 
CaptnJohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Eastern NC
Posts: 3,963
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ejs4029 View Post
The last time I checked a hammer can still crack an egg....My decision to buy a diesel was based on wants not needs....And I have to chuckle when someone tells me or suggests I don't need a diesel to tow my 8K...Buy what makes you a Happy Camper
I agree, "buy what makes you a Happy Camper "!and what you can easily afford. Just buy a camper that fits your truck. Too many decide on the truck then buy a camper that doesn't or just barely meets the numbers. Then they tell themselves stories about what a great job it does.
CaptnJohn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2017, 12:12 PM   #267
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 10,907
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ejs4029 View Post
The last time I checked a hammer can still crack an egg....My decision to buy a diesel was based on wants not needs....And I have to chuckle when someone tells me or suggests I don't need a diesel to tow my 8K...Buy what makes you a Happy Camper
So you WANTED a diesel (and presumably you were able to afford a diesel) - that's fine.

What bothers me is when the poster says that someone NEEDS a diesel to pull a 5,000 lb trailer. And it seems to me like most/many (certainly not "all") of the pro-diesel people on this forum do that. Go read the gas vs diesel threads and you see it over and over. We typically know zilch about a posters finances, so now we could be telling some guy with a mortgage on his house, and a new loan on his trailer to go add another $7-10K onto his loan for his TV. Just doesn't seem like a forthright thing to do.

The issue is that, as a minimum, we need to encourage people to match their TV to their towing load and potentially where they're towing. If they want to go over that, it's fine, but we shouldn't go telling people that they have to do it.

I could easily afford a diesel, but I don't WANT one and more importantly, I don't NEED one.
__________________
1988 Coleman Sequoia - popup (1987-2009) - outlasted 3 Dodge Grand Caravans!
2012 Roo19 - hybrid (2012-2015)

2016 Mini Lite 2503S - tt (2015 - ???)
2011 Traverse LT, 3.6L, FWD
2009 Silverado 1500 Ext Cab, 5.3L, 4x4, 3.73
2016 Silverado 2500HD Dbl Cab, 6.0L 4x4, 4.10
rockfordroo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2017, 01:19 PM   #268
Senior Member
 
jacknife's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Ramona Ca
Posts: 302
My point is made. Get whatever you can pull your Trl over Mountains with at a decent speed. I you live and camp in terrain that is not much of a challenge them you don't need that much truck. I live out west and run over some pretty steep grades pulling 14 ,000 . A Diesel and exhaust brake are the best way to go with that type of weight.
jacknife is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2017, 02:04 PM   #269
Senior Member
 
Ejs4029's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Denver, NC
Posts: 2,633
Quote:
Originally Posted by rockfordroo View Post
So you WANTED a diesel (and presumably you were able to afford a diesel) - that's fine.

What bothers me is when the poster says that someone NEEDS a diesel to pull a 5,000 lb trailer. And it seems to me like most/many (certainly not "all") of the pro-diesel people on this forum do that. Go read the gas vs diesel threads and you see it over and over. We typically know zilch about a posters finances, so now we could be telling some guy with a mortgage on his house, and a new loan on his trailer to go add another $7-10K onto his loan for his TV. Just doesn't seem like a forthright thing to do.

The issue is that, as a minimum, we need to encourage people to match their TV to their towing load and potentially where they're towing. If they want to go over that, it's fine, but we shouldn't go telling people that they have to do it.

I could easily afford a diesel, but I don't WANT one and more importantly, I don't NEED one.

I agree with what you are saying about matching your TV to their towing load and potentially where you are towing of course everyone has opinions on the subject and that's pretty much where I stop giving any advise.

There can be other factors that go into choosing a TV as well and any poster that asks a question on a public forum like this is going to get a barrage of opinions.

Personally I have enough things going on in my life to worry about other peoples finances or if they can afford to buy a TV yet alone anything else. I think people should try and make the best educated purchase decisions based on their fact findings. Fact is I don't need alot of things that I have in my life but I still have them..Good Bad or In Different there are still more things that I want and I don't need to justify any of them to anyone but myself
__________________
2015 Ram 2500 CTD,CC,SB,4x4
2016 Rockwood 2703 Emerald Edition
Husky CenterLine TS Hitch
TST 507 TPMS
Progressive Industries EMS-PT30X
Ejs4029 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2017, 07:40 AM   #270
Senior Member
 
muddyrode's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: SE Iowa
Posts: 628
Spock123 oh just bite the bullet and go for it
or you can have a truck built special for you
such as one of these
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	ford 6 door dually truck - Google Search_2017-10-17_07-36-51.jpg
Views:	84
Size:	81.5 KB
ID:	154411  
__________________
2016 SANDPIPER 35ROK
2013 Silverado Duramax 3500HD DRW LB

Stop worrying about the potholes in the road and enjoy the journey
muddyrode is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2017, 07:50 PM   #271
Senior Member
 
Chuckinca's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Summerfield, FL
Posts: 382
Been in our 24' TT and Ram 3500 Diesel for 6 years. Mostly going back and forth from Norcal to Central Fla twice a year. 95% of the time you put that truck in cruise and forget it.

We sold our place in Norcal in March and will not be making that trip but will still want to get out of Fla in the summer. Was looking at 30' Class C Sunseekers but believe they only have 4 forward gears, no tow/haul and no Jake brake. Probably a deal breaker as we really like the mtns and the control that the diesel PU has.

Are there any Class A or Class C rigs that are affordable that compare to the power options of a diesel PU & TT?

Thanks

.
__________________
2018 Flagstaff 29KSWS
2008 Ram Laramie 3500 Megacab 4x4 Cummins 6.7L Turbo Diesel
Chuckinca is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2017, 09:58 PM   #272
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Colorado
Posts: 591
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chuckinca View Post
Are there any Class A or Class C rigs that are affordable that compare to the power options of a diesel PU & TT?
The short answer is "no" if you want an inexpensive 30' diesel with more than 4 gears and an exhaust brake.

I have asked both dealers and manufacturer reps for years why the F-450 chassis used in so many mid-size, front-engine Class A and C motorhomes couldn't substitute the Ford Power Stroke diesel for the ubiquitous V-10 gasser. Since both are available in Super Duty trucks, the diesel should be an option in the Ford coach chassis.. No one has yet come up with a reasonable answer.

A few companies are now building "Super C" front-diesel coaches, but most are built on expensive 35-40' Freightliner chassis. So that still leaves a big gap in the diesel coach lineup between 25' Mercedes Sprinters and 35+' Class A pushers and Super C's.
fanrgs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2017, 02:46 PM   #273
Senior Member
 
Chuckinca's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Summerfield, FL
Posts: 382
Thanks for the info.

Guess we get a 30' or so TT and keep the 3500 Ram Diesel.

.
__________________
2018 Flagstaff 29KSWS
2008 Ram Laramie 3500 Megacab 4x4 Cummins 6.7L Turbo Diesel
Chuckinca is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2017, 07:29 PM   #274
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 4
We have 2018 33IK that we tow with a 2012 Ram 2500 6.7-liter Cummins turbo diesel, with exhaust brake . I added air bags tows great. Can't imagine a gas having as much towing power.
__________________
Dave

2018 Silverback 33IK
2012 Ram 2500
Lr195 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2017, 12:46 PM   #275
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 187
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lr195 View Post
We have 2018 33IK that we tow with a 2012 Ram 2500 6.7-liter Cummins turbo diesel, with exhaust brake . I added air bags tows great. Can't imagine a gas having as much towing power.


I found one fairly close! Bentley Mulsanne Speed. 811 foot pounds of torque! No trailer towing option available though.
prestonj12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2017, 10:28 PM   #276
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 248
I had a 2010 1500, i needed bigger truck for my work dump trailer. I went Diesel because i wanted too. Then bought another and then the camper got bigger. I tow almost 15k lbs. I would never do that with a gasser. I would tow my older 6000 lb TT i had tho with a gasser, assuming no mountains regularly. I do like the power of a diesel. I now have a 6.2l F350 for a worker that tows my dump trailer an few times a week. I towed with that when i first bought it and I tried to pull into traffic and i forgot i had didnt have the 6.7l and made someone unhappy pulling out. Both trucks off the line empty are pretty close. After the turbo lag, the 6.2l is still at my doors, well for a little bit. I just bought my 3rd Super Duty, and if i had not have any camper trailer, i might have went back to a loaded F150 with max tow. The gas mileage i get out of the f150 loaners is amazing. Different Strokes for Different folks.
__________________
2017 Sierra 372LOK
2017 Ford F350 DRW
brian372lok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2017, 06:45 AM   #277
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Suffolk, Va.
Posts: 1,413
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mtelkman View Post
I think the general consensus is towing hills with a diesel is easier. But that comes at the increased maintenance cost on the newer diesels as well as losing a bit of payload as the diesel engine is heavier than the gas engine. Any of the big 3 newer diesels are all excellent engines. On the older engines you need to be a bit more choosy.

If you plan to tow a lot, I suggest the diesel. If only rarely towing then I would think it might not be worth the extra expense. FWIW, I am glad I have a diesel.
If you are counting the pounds of the engine difference you need a bigger truck and you need a diesel.
__________________
Michael & Fran Dilday (Baxter & Honey 2 Labs)
'18 Cedar Creek Champagne 38EL - '17 Ford F350 Lariat DRW w/Reese hitch - TST 507 Color TPMS - Garmin RV 770 LMT GPS
mwdilday is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
diesel, gas, tow vehicle


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


» Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by

Disclaimer:

This website is not affiliated with or endorsed by Forest River, Inc. or any of its affiliates. This is an independent, unofficial site.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:33 PM.