Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-03-2014, 03:40 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
French's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Guelph Ontario
Posts: 133
Revised 2014 Pin weights for Rockwood 5's

Just got a phone call back from Brett at Forest River. I had inquired about the new revised lite 5 pin weights that were just uploaded recently for all Rockwood lite 5's. Thanks to Joe Mazz for the heads up. According to Brett these changes were made in April /May as they began to manufacture the 2014's. The unit we have our eye on was manufactured in June2013 and he confirmed that the 8282 built then DOES have a 12% INCREASE in pin weight FROM WHAT THEIR PRINTED LITERATURE CLAIMS (1184LB in the brochure 1324LB online). They do not update the printed brochures that often and if you read the back of the brochure thay say 'they reserve the right to change specifications ..." basically at their discretion. So bottom line for us the 8282 is a non starter. The good news is that Brett mentioned the 8280 and the new 8285IKS are redesigned and have now have bedroom doors! as well as larger 72gal gray tanks than the 8282 so we are still thinking Rockwood
__________________
Dave and Joanne
Southwestern Ontario
2016 Ford F250 Lariat crew cab 6.7
2021 Flagstaff Classic 8529IKBS
What do you say to comfort a friend who’s struggling with grammar? There, their, they’re.
French is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2014, 03:49 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 496
Did he give a reason for the weight change? Are they using different frames?
__________________
2001 Ford F250 7.3l converted to F350 specs
2014 Flagstaff 8528RKWS
2006 model year Border Collie
Mtelkman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2014, 04:00 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
French's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Guelph Ontario
Posts: 133
weight change reasons

He did not elaborate on specifically why weights had changed. only that these units are constantly being revised and changed as user feedback and manufacturing feedback is received. If you look at the changes in pin weight there are some that only changed a few pounds to almost 200 lb. Some went up some went down. I listed all the changes in a previous post here
Only one unit (the 8285 not the new 8285IKWS) was the same pin weight as last year (2013)
__________________
Dave and Joanne
Southwestern Ontario
2016 Ford F250 Lariat crew cab 6.7
2021 Flagstaff Classic 8529IKBS
What do you say to comfort a friend who’s struggling with grammar? There, their, they’re.
French is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2014, 10:30 PM   #4
WFD
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,947
Is that 1 - 72 gal gray tank or is it 2 separate gray tanks, (a bathroom gray and kitchen gray) for a total of 72 gal ?

Rick
WFD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2014, 08:50 AM   #5
Senior Member
 
French's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Guelph Ontario
Posts: 133
I checked the forest river site. The gray tank is 76 gallons total for the 8280 and the 8285ikws while the 8282 is exactly half at 36 gallons. I can only surmise that they use 2 -38 gallon tanks.
__________________
Dave and Joanne
Southwestern Ontario
2016 Ford F250 Lariat crew cab 6.7
2021 Flagstaff Classic 8529IKBS
What do you say to comfort a friend who’s struggling with grammar? There, their, they’re.
French is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2014, 08:51 AM   #6
Senior Member
 
French's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Guelph Ontario
Posts: 133
Make that 38 gallons
__________________
Dave and Joanne
Southwestern Ontario
2016 Ford F250 Lariat crew cab 6.7
2021 Flagstaff Classic 8529IKBS
What do you say to comfort a friend who’s struggling with grammar? There, their, they’re.
French is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2014, 05:25 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
JoeMazz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 177
This would explain why the 2013 I tested dipped my Truck far less than the 2014 I bought (built in June 2013).
I love my rig, but if I could get a do over, I would probably have bought the 8280ws. Every lb. counts...

Quote:
Originally Posted by French View Post
Just got a phone call back from Brett at Forest River. I had inquired about the new revised lite 5 pin weights that were just uploaded recently for all Rockwood lite 5's. Thanks to Joe Mazz for the heads up. According to Brett these changes were made in April /May as they began to manufacture the 2014's. The unit we have our eye on was manufactured in June2013 and he confirmed that the 8282 built then DOES have a 12% INCREASE in pin weight FROM WHAT THEIR PRINTED LITERATURE CLAIMS (1184LB in the brochure 1324LB online). They do not update the printed brochures that often and if you read the back of the brochure thay say 'they reserve the right to change specifications ..." basically at their discretion. So bottom line for us the 8282 is a non starter. The good news is that Brett mentioned the 8280 and the new 8285IKS are redesigned and have now have bedroom doors! as well as larger 72gal gray tanks than the 8282 so we are still thinking Rockwood
__________________
2015 Jayco Precept 35UP

JoeMazz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2014, 08:43 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
French's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Guelph Ontario
Posts: 133
joeMazz Yes I understand, I thought about your careful research and the fact that you were given incorrect data to make your decision. Kind of a bummer...
The good news is thAt FR indicated that the rigs now have a door on the bedroom instead of that paper thin translucent sliding partition. Perhaps u could get the dealer to retrofit your rig with one?
__________________
Dave and Joanne
Southwestern Ontario
2016 Ford F250 Lariat crew cab 6.7
2021 Flagstaff Classic 8529IKBS
What do you say to comfort a friend who’s struggling with grammar? There, their, they’re.
French is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2014, 08:59 PM   #9
Senior Member
 
JoeMazz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 177
Forest River website still does not show a door on the 82 82.
For now I'm not adding any weight in front of those axles until I take her on a long trip and see how she handles. That'll be this summer up to Niagara . I'll tell you though it drives pretty nice on the short trips I've taken so far. We'll see......

Sent from my DROID RAZR HD using Forest River Forums mobile app
__________________
2015 Jayco Precept 35UP

JoeMazz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2014, 09:12 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
French's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Guelph Ontario
Posts: 133
You are wise to wait till summer for Niagara. We live 80miles away and we have a full blown blizzard happening now. -24 is forecast as overnight low. I hear it is cool all the way to you folks. To clarify Brett at FR said the 8285ikws and the 8280 had doors in his rig schematic pictures. Perhaps they would fit yours as well. He did indicate that there was some customer feedback that a door was a needed feature on the otherwise well equipped rig.
__________________
Dave and Joanne
Southwestern Ontario
2016 Ford F250 Lariat crew cab 6.7
2021 Flagstaff Classic 8529IKBS
What do you say to comfort a friend who’s struggling with grammar? There, their, they’re.
French is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2014, 09:26 PM   #11
WFD
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,947
French....noticed you are from Guelph. We have family in Guelph but have never been there with trailer in tow...have flown there, driven car there, but would like to take the 5th down there one of these summers. Are there nice RV parks or campgrounds very close to Guelph? We like full service.

Rick
Winnipeg
WFD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2014, 12:02 AM   #12
Infractee
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 796
I wonder if the addition of the Reese Sidewinder pin box is also affecting pin weights? It is heavier by itself than a standard unit and it seems it would increase the moment arm of pin itself?
RhoZeta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2014, 02:51 AM   #13
Moderator Emeritus
 
Dave_Monica's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,327
Quote:
Originally Posted by RhoZeta View Post
I wonder if the addition of the Reese Sidewinder pin box is also affecting pin weights? It is heavier by itself than a standard unit and it seems it would increase the moment arm of pin itself?
They have been using the Sidewinder pinbox as standard on Rockwood/Flagstaff 5vers starting in 2010.

Dave
__________________


Nights camped in 2013 - 55, 2014 - 105, 2015 - 63
Dave_Monica is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2014, 01:12 PM   #14
Infractee
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 796
Well maybe they just now getting around to revising the specs....
RhoZeta is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
rockwood, weight


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


» Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by

Disclaimer:

This website is not affiliated with or endorsed by Forest River, Inc. or any of its affiliates. This is an independent, unofficial site.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:52 AM.