Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-27-2012, 10:12 PM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 5
Sport vs. Select suspension

I'm wondering about the suspension on the SP280/other Sport models. Any reason the Sport models come with leaf springs and only the Select come with Torsion suspension? After owning trailers with both types the Torsion seems to give a smoother ride. Will we be able to tell a difference between towing a Sport model vs. a Select model? We've got a Rockwood Roo now and love the way it tows and we've had a great experience with Forest River so far. We need to keep the weight under 4500-4800 lbs so the SP280 and SP260 have really caught my eye.
__________________

__________________
Andy F is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2012, 10:53 PM   #2
Site Team
 
acadianbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: St. Paul, Minnesota
Posts: 2,919
Well, since you've towed both kinds, you are probably more qualified to answer your own question than any of us on the forum!!

We have the torsion suspension on our Surveyor and all I can say is that I love the way it tows. I also think you get slightly better towing mileage because they sit a good 18" lower than almost any other trailer.

Good luck with your decision. Happy camping.
__________________

__________________
http://i421.photobucket.com/albums/pp297/acadianbob/IMG_2757.jpg
2012 F150 FX4 Ecoboost, 2016 Surveyor 274BHS
2003 Yamaha FJR1300, Demco Premiere Slider
1969 John Deere 1020, 1940 Ford 9N, 1948 Ford 8N
Jonsered 535, Can of WD-40, Duct Tape
Red Green coffee mugs
acadianbob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2012, 01:33 AM   #3
Senior Member
 
flyrotor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 755
[QUOTE=acadianbob;165018they sit a good 18" lower than almost any other trailer.QUOTE]

That's probably the exact reason the Sport is only available on leaf springs, I would expect the sport model is built to handle the back roads and unimproved roads which would need the higher clearence.
__________________
flyrotor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2012, 08:18 AM   #4
Senior Member
 
shineysideup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: ONTARIO, CANADA
Posts: 367
Bob makes a great point that is often overlooked. The trailer sits much lower, thus a little less "sail" effect.

I believe the "sports" are at a lower start point (with less content), at least in my area. That's not to say that the sport isn't a great trailer. From what I understand, torsion suspension is more costly, it may be the biggest reason it isn't in the sport.

I've followed all kinds of trailers traveling on highways, the biggest thing I notice is the bounce associated with a leaf spring suspension, especially in smaller utility trailers. You won't drive your truck without shocks, why are trailers any different? Better dealers will install or offer shocks for leaf spring setups.
__________________


Shineysideup
shineysideup is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2012, 10:07 PM   #5
Member
 
LunaTech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 46
We have a 2011 SP260 and tow it using a 2004 F150 and Equalizer hitch and it tows great. I've never had any sway or excessive bounce. Even in higher winds I've never had an issue. We love ours.
__________________
Jeff
Foothills of NC
2012 Starcraft Autumn Ridge 309BHL
2004 F-150 4x4 Super Crew
Equalizer WDH
2000 Kawasaki ZRX1100
LunaTech is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-29-2012, 11:28 AM   #6
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 5
Thanks everyone for your responses. Its interesting that Rockwood has placed the Torsion suspension on all of their Roos/Shamrocks but Surveyor is keeping leaf springs on the Sport models. We have definitely noticed a difference going from our old Starcraft with leaf springs to the Roo back in 2008.

I do need some clearance in the rear for our driveway and it did look like the SP280/SP260 might sit-up a bit higher in the back with leaf springs when compared to the SV291 with Torsion.

Bob-how do you like your 235RKS? That is another model we have looked at and I really like the compact size which is very comparable to our 233 Roo. Our big concern with it is not having access to the kitchen table and couch while traveling along with what seems to be lack of storage/closet space inside. Its too bad Surveyor doesn't extend "up" the wardrobe by the front bunks/door all the way to the ceiling for more space like Jayco and Keystone do. It doesn't make sense to me.

Andy
__________________
Andy F is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-29-2012, 11:40 AM   #7
Site Team
 
acadianbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: St. Paul, Minnesota
Posts: 2,919
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy F View Post
Bob-how do you like your 235RKS? That is another model we have looked at and I really like the compact size which is very comparable to our 233 Roo. Our big concern with it is not having access to the kitchen table and couch while traveling along with what seems to be lack of storage/closet space inside. Its too bad Surveyor doesn't extend "up" the wardrobe by the front bunks/door all the way to the ceiling for more space like Jayco and Keystone do. It doesn't make sense to me.

Andy
Hey Andy. Well, you "pegged" the 235RKS pretty well. Storage is a little short for clothing and not a lot of floor space on a rainy day with kids. The table and couch is a non-issue for us because it is so easy to run the slide out. Electric and takes but a minute. BUT, we love our 235. Lots space to store things though where the bunks are in front; bikes, telescope, dog kennel, you name it. And very compact for the features; easy to tow; light weight. We chose this model primarily because we go to a lot of "out of the way" National Forest Service campgrounds. Rough roads, tight turns, smaller sites; so this trailer is perfect for the 2 of us and our 2 little dogs. Been to a lot of beautiful places where a bigger trailer would never have made it.

Happy camping man.
__________________
http://i421.photobucket.com/albums/pp297/acadianbob/IMG_2757.jpg
2012 F150 FX4 Ecoboost, 2016 Surveyor 274BHS
2003 Yamaha FJR1300, Demco Premiere Slider
1969 John Deere 1020, 1940 Ford 9N, 1948 Ford 8N
Jonsered 535, Can of WD-40, Duct Tape
Red Green coffee mugs
acadianbob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-29-2012, 11:44 AM   #8
Site Team
 
acadianbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: St. Paul, Minnesota
Posts: 2,919
Andy, for what it is worth, here is another reason I like torsion suspension. It essentially gives you independent suspension. When one side smacks something, the other side of the same axle is undisturbed; resulting in a more stable tow. With leaf spring, one side effects the other.
__________________
http://i421.photobucket.com/albums/pp297/acadianbob/IMG_2757.jpg
2012 F150 FX4 Ecoboost, 2016 Surveyor 274BHS
2003 Yamaha FJR1300, Demco Premiere Slider
1969 John Deere 1020, 1940 Ford 9N, 1948 Ford 8N
Jonsered 535, Can of WD-40, Duct Tape
Red Green coffee mugs
acadianbob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-29-2012, 07:14 PM   #9
Senior Member
 
shineysideup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: ONTARIO, CANADA
Posts: 367
Quote:
Originally Posted by acadianbob

Hey Andy. Well, you "pegged" the 235RKS pretty well. Storage is a little short for clothing and not a lot of floor space on a rainy day with kids. The table and couch is a non-issue for us because it is so easy to run the slide out. Electric and takes but a minute. BUT, we love our 235. Lots space to store things though where the bunks are in front; bikes, telescope, dog kennel, you name it. And very compact for the features; easy to tow; light weight. We chose this model primarily because we go to a lot of "out of the way" National Forest Service campgrounds. Rough roads, tight turns, smaller sites; so this trailer is perfect for the 2 of us and our 2 little dogs. Been to a lot of beautiful places where a bigger trailer would never have made it.

Happy camping man.
Bob has summed it it pretty well. The space was never an issue for our family (2 kids, 2 adults), but the lack of storage was. I took care of most of that last summer, I did exactly what you said and extended the wardrobe to the ceiling, along with a few other tricks! The 1/2 door and storage space when the bunk is folded will fit all of our bikes and more. The only real knock I have is that the bed is 74" long and obviously not walk around. Compact over convenience I guess.
__________________


Shineysideup
shineysideup is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2012, 11:03 AM   #10
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 5
We have a few questions for you guys with the 235 RKS rear slide. Can you climb on the bed when the slide is "in"? I've seen some posts, I think by owners of the Keystone Outback, that they have been told to stay off the bed when it is stored inside the camper. And what about packing up at camp after any rain, etc? Do you have to dry off the slide before retracting it? Seems like you could end up getting water inside because your stowing the slide over your dinette and couch.
__________________

__________________
Andy
2008 Rockwood Roo 233-Sold
2012 Keystone Bullet 281 BHS
2004 Toyota Sequoia
Andy F is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



» Virginia Campgrounds

Reviews provided by




ForestRiverForums.com is not in any way associated with Forest River, Inc. or its associated RV manufacturing divisions.


Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:10 AM.