 |
|
09-30-2009, 02:53 PM
|
#1
|
|
2011 Berkshire 390bh
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Western NY State
Posts: 432
|
2010 Diesel Emission Standards
There are some pretty tough new emission standards coming out in 2010 for Diesel engines. Cummins is using a technology which will inject urea into the exhaust while Detroit is using an exhaust method that puts the exhaust back into the engine as I understand it. The standards are stingent enough that Cat has ceased making over the road Diesel engines for 2010. My question is, do you think someone should buy now to avoid the new requirements, or don't worry about it, or wait a few years until the bugs are ironed out of the new engines?
__________________
|
|
|
09-30-2009, 03:40 PM
|
#2
|
|
Campfire Master
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Shelby Township, MI
Posts: 70
|
The GM Duramax is also going to the urea injection system. The system works so well, in some cities the air coming out of the engine is cleaner than the air going in.
Having said that...if I had a choice I would buy now to avoid having to fill the urea tank as needed.
AVid
__________________

2009 Wildcat 28RKBS
2008 GMC 2500HD DMax/Allison
|
|
|
09-30-2009, 05:07 PM
|
#3
|
|
Grape Escape
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Southern Ontario
Posts: 571
|
I understand new BMW car diesels already have the urea injection
__________________
2008 Cardinal 30RKLE 5th wheel XPS tires
2009 Ford F250 CC 4x4 V10 Reese Signature 18K 5th
55 nights 2009
53 nights 2010
44 nights 2011
|
|
|
09-30-2009, 10:56 PM
|
#4
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 28
|
It sounds like the 2009 diesels are getting terrible fuel mileage load or unloaded so hopefully this doesn't make it worse. I have been wondering about buying a low mileage '06 or '07 due to this.
__________________
|
|
|
10-22-2009, 09:28 PM
|
#5
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 105
|
Wait later till the bugs leave.
__________________
|
|
|
10-23-2009, 07:04 AM
|
#6
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: PA
Posts: 132
|
Don't forget that there 2 versions of what is being talked about here.....
The OP is talking motorhome diesel engines, (it is posted in the MOTORHOME forum) which are different from the diesels in our pick up trucks. The current Cummins motor in pickups is already compliant with the 2010 standards, WITHOUT a urea tank. The Duramax and Ford diesels will use urea in the 2010 pickup engines.
I am not up to date on the motorhome diesels, but I did hear that CAT was backing out of them.
__________________
Steve and Vicki
2 kids
2006 Dodge CTD
2008 Wildcat 32QBBS
|
|
|
10-23-2009, 01:42 PM
|
#7
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: homebase Quitman Texas at Lake Fork
Posts: 1,390
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2008Wildcat
Don't forget that there 2 versions of what is being talked about here.....
The OP is talking motorhome diesel engines, (it is posted in the MOTORHOME forum) which are different from the diesels in our pick up trucks. The current Cummins motor in pickups is already compliant with the 2010 standards, WITHOUT a urea tank. The Duramax and Ford diesels will use urea in the 2010 pickup engines.
I am not up to date on the motorhome diesels, but I did hear that CAT was backing out of them.
|
yep
the 6.4 cummins by virture of its egr is 2010 legal
however, dont look for it to be around in that config very long
egr has been problematic for a all three and thats the other reason they are going with urea.
the urea should by design regain some mpg and not reduce HP
fords new pickup engine is stated as going 7500 miles from one urea tank fill
i would assume all will be close to that.
cat...is a killer they gave up the ghost for the 2010 over the road engine....however i would expect them to be back, to big of a market to not re-look at the engineering
__________________
Living in the Piney Woods of Texas.
|
|
|
10-24-2009, 09:19 PM
|
#8
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Tulsa
Posts: 309
|
Yikes.. yet another thing to pay for / fill up / remember...
I'm sticking with the Triton V10.. 362 hp / 457 lb·ft
__________________
|
|
|
12-16-2009, 07:41 AM
|
#9
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: St. Paul, Minnesota
Posts: 1,289
|
By the time you figure the extra cost of the diesel, the extra cost of diesel fuel, the cost to fill the urea, the V-10 gasser may be a viable alternative; at least for some. Depends on how much you have to pull and how far you have to pull. No one right answer but the diesel is not necessarily a no-brainer answer for everyone.
__________________

2012 F150 FX4 Ecoboost, 2008 Surveyor 235RKS
2003 Yamaha FJR1300, Reese Dual Cam WD
1969 John Deere 1020, 1940 Ford 9N
Jonsered 535, Can of WD-40, Hostess Cupcakes
|
|
|
12-16-2009, 11:43 PM
|
#10
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 730
|
As there is some discussion regarding gas vs. diesel, I've attached a link to a test done in 2007 comparing gas vs diesel 3/4 and 1 ton pick-up trucks...makes for interesting reading.
http://mrtruck.net/shootout5a.htm
Dave
__________________

2008 F250 CC SB 6.8L V10
2010 Rockwood 8280WS
Nights camped in 2010 - 58, 2011 - 43
|
|
|
 |
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Threads |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Online Users: 353 |
| 46 members and 307 guests |
| acadianbob, autorot8, BelgianSquiggy, brookside, buzzmonster, Char_n_Kath, Deputyseven, donn, Douglasdh62, Elanpottery, Emptypockets, freedom 750, GaryRudolph, GASPEDDLER, halliday, herk7769, Iggy, Itsthetwoofus, JDWeir, Jeep4Two, JFM-jr, jsutherl, katsmeow62, Laura, leencharlotte, leomosley, Linnemj, martin73, mckirby50, Newellri, RayJae, RED Baron, reliefman, rerger, rkswyo, Rod Johnson, Shelley4832, skgeorgy, slipf18, Sockman, stevos, Terier, tucket, wayne anthony, Wildwood Danny, wvcampers |
| Most users ever online was 881, 06-22-2011 at 11:07 AM. |
|