Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-06-2013, 11:12 PM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Wylie, Texas
Posts: 2
Talking Windjammer vs V-Cross

What can someone tell me about the Windjammer vs. V Cross. Seems these units make sense in their design.
jparker66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2013, 08:22 AM   #2
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Wylie, Texas
Posts: 2
Additional Question: Some have told me that the front cap on the V-Cross is not well constructed. Anyone know anything about the roof construction and the front cap?
Thanks
jparker66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2013, 10:20 AM   #3
Moderator Emeritus
 
Dave_Monica's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,327
Quote:
Originally Posted by jparker66 View Post
What can someone tell me about the Windjammer vs. V Cross. Seems these units make sense in their design.

The V nose offers some unique floorplan options. In spite of claims otherwise, there doesn't seem to be any improvement in fuel mileage towing vs conventional campers. Here's a link to one article, there's many more using the search function...
http://www.forestriverforums.com/for...ler-19656.html

Dave
__________________


Nights camped in 2013 - 55, 2014 - 105, 2015 - 63
Dave_Monica is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2013, 10:49 AM   #4
Senior Member
 
Old car's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: south Kansas City area
Posts: 1,298
We just completed our third season with a Windjammer. The floor plan sold us on the trailer along with the quality aspects. We have the kitchen in the nose. I've never pulled a flat front trailer but I believe Dave is correct--no real gas mileage advantage. Our trailer pulls easily with the Equalizer WDH but again, I have nothing to compare it to. As for the roof, I get up on mine (205 lbs) every trip to sweep off the slideouts and while up there I inspect around all vents, etc. We also cover ours in the winter so I have to get up there to clean and put the cover on. It holds me without issue. I do not walk on the roof portion of the front cap. We love the trailer now as much as the day we purchased it.
__________________

Randy and Patty
2015 Sabre 33 CKTS-6 Platinum Edition
Reese 16K Slider hitch
2015 GMC Sierra 3500HD diesel dually
Old car is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2013, 02:49 PM   #5
Site Team
 
bikendan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Goodyear, Arizona
Posts: 33,780
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave_Monica View Post
In spite of claims otherwise, there doesn't seem to be any improvement in fuel mileage towing vs conventional campers. Here's a link to one article, there's many more using the search function...
http://www.forestriverforums.com/for...ler-19656.html

Dave
x2! if there's any improvement in gas mileage, with a V-nose trailer, it would be only a mere fraction of improvement that would off-set what a V-nose loses in front room area, compared to a similar-sized conventional TT.
__________________
Dan-Retired California Firefighter/EMT
Shawn-Musician/Entrepreneur/Wine Expert
and Zoe the Wonder Dog(R.I.P.)
2016 PrimeTime TracerAIR 255, pushing a 2014 Ford F150 SCREW XTR 4x4 3.5 Ecoboost w/Max Tow Package
4pt Equal-i-zer WDH and 1828lbs of payload capacity
bikendan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2013, 07:03 AM   #6
Wanna Be Camper
 
SaskCampers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Moose Jaw, Saskatchewan
Posts: 2,420
Quote:
Originally Posted by bikendan View Post
x2! if there's any improvement in gas mileage, with a V-nose trailer, it would be only a mere fraction of improvement that would off-set what a V-nose loses in front room area, compared to a similar-sized conventional TT.
It is totally wrong to say there is a loss of space, the V nose actually gains space vs loses. If you notice the design extends much further forward on the frame rails and the tanks are now inside the nose, not sitting on the front of the frame. I would say there is at least 2 feet more interior space in the V that conventional units do not have, ours is an amazing walk in closet. Now to the OP, we still love our front bedroom unit as much as the day it came home in 2010 and it have been super reliable and very easy to add upgrades to. As to the roof, I walk on ours every trip as well to check the slide etc and never an issue.
__________________

John & Deb
2011 F250 Lariat FX4 Crew Cab 6.2
2011 Flagstaff V-Lite 30WRLS
SaskCampers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2013, 08:28 AM   #7
Alleged curmudgeon
 
Vern's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Southwest Michigan
Posts: 558
After two years with our Windjammer, we are very happy with the floor plan, quality and towing performance. I concur that, while it tows very nicely, I suspect the talk about any gas mileage advantage is just salesmanship or speculation.

Your real question seems to be about comparing the Rockwood Windjammer to the Flagstaff V-Cross, and I'm not sure you have received any answers to that. We looked at both when shopping for our TT, and my understanding is that these two lines are "sister" lines with essentially identical floor plans, both made by Forest River (probably in the same plant), and that the primary differences are in name only and the decals. If anyone has other info, please chime in.
__________________
Lee
2013 Windjammer 3008W
2006 Chevy Silverado 2500HD 6.0L w/Equalizer 4
Nights camped: 2012 (29); 2013 (26); 2014 (40); 2015 (43); 2016 (35); 2017 (34); 2018 (39); 2019 (30); 2020 (16); 2021 (14); 2022 to date (12)
Vern is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2013, 09:05 AM   #8
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Florida East Coast
Posts: 315
We too have a Windjammer with the kitchen in the front. It pulls better than our flat front trailer did but I now use an Equalizer hitch so I think the hitch may be the reason more than the V nose design. Gas mileage increase is probably a myth by salesmen as I have never seen any tests to document their claims. I get around 10 with mine at 55 mph, no wind conditions pulling it with a Silverado gasser.

Flagstaff makes a V Lite line which are identical to the Windjammers. There is also a V Cross line which have heavier frames and higher GVWRs.
Windjammin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2013, 09:11 AM   #9
Alleged curmudgeon
 
Vern's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Southwest Michigan
Posts: 558
Quote:
Originally Posted by Windjammin View Post
We too have a Windjammer with the kitchen in the front. It pulls better than our flat front trailer did but I now use an Equalizer hitch so I think the hitch may be the reason more than the V nose design. Gas mileage increase is probably a myth by salesmen as I have never seen any tests to document their claims. I get around 10 with mine at 55 mph, no wind conditions pulling it with a Silverado gasser.

Flagstaff makes a V Lite line which are identical to the Windjammers. There is also a V Cross line which have heavier frames and higher GVWRs.
Maybe the Windjammers and V-Cross are not identical then, I stand corrected. Windjammin - you should feel good about your 10 mpg, my Silverado gasser and 3008W are a 8.5 mpg combo. I did not get into this for gas mileage, so I'm not sweating it, but 10 mpg is pretty good.
__________________
Lee
2013 Windjammer 3008W
2006 Chevy Silverado 2500HD 6.0L w/Equalizer 4
Nights camped: 2012 (29); 2013 (26); 2014 (40); 2015 (43); 2016 (35); 2017 (34); 2018 (39); 2019 (30); 2020 (16); 2021 (14); 2022 to date (12)
Vern is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2013, 09:58 AM   #10
Denver, CO
 
garbonz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 2,102
My VCross Platinum 5er has served me well for its first year. I believe that the VCross are made in the Cherokee plant, but I have not been able to confirm.. Mine seems to have a stronger suspension 5K axles and 16 inch wheels than necessary, and has a 250 lb rack in back. I am very happy with it
__________________
2017 Fuse 23T
garbonz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2013, 10:20 AM   #11
Senior Member
 
mark0224's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,443
I just got a V lite and towed it only once but when I checked mileage got 10 mpg on 2 lane highway with up and down hills and little towns I had to slow down for. My old tt was 2000 lbs less and 6 ft shorter but only got 9.8 mpg on interstate so mileage was little if any, didn't feel the wind as much when tractor trailers went by which was good.
mark0224 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2013, 11:42 AM   #12
Pirate Todd and Wench
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Pasadena Maryland
Posts: 78
The Winjammer is just a step up from the v-cross, that's all. They do tow more stable I think with the v-nose, but what sold us was the floor plan and finally a place to put the kitchen without intruding on the rest of the floor plan. The windjammer has a heavier duty "nose" piece, rock guards on the windows up front, lower skirt around the rig and a few other things. It's all what you can afford, they are both great rigs. I recommend this floor plan "highly", even with small children....whenever you have bunks on a tt, they whack the floorplan and the space is only usable while your sleeping. I have the 3008 and all together three queen beds! Fold the two up and you have space nearly that of a small condo!
__________________
-Todd and Sherri
-2006 F250 Super Duty King ranch Diesel
-2012 Windjammer 3008w
-Equilzer 1200lb hitch
mrtodds is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2013, 01:04 PM   #13
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Waynesville
Posts: 14,428
Windjammer & V-Lite are made in the Same plant. V-Cross is made elsewhere. Price is NOT a scale to judge any of the (3). Money will NOT produce a (Good Dealer,Quality Workmanship,or a Flawless RV). Buy what you and your Family like,and USE it! Youroo!!
youroo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2013, 10:39 AM   #14
Denver, CO
 
garbonz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 2,102
Quote:
Originally Posted by youroo View Post
Windjammer & V-Lite are made in the Same plant. V-Cross is made elsewhere. Price is NOT a scale to judge any of the (3). Money will NOT produce a (Good Dealer,Quality Workmanship,or a Flawless RV). Buy what you and your Family like,and USE it! Youroo!!

I think the V-Cross is made in the Cherokee Plant, according tot the warrantee/parts contact info.
__________________
2017 Fuse 23T
garbonz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2013, 10:22 AM   #15
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Cleveland, GA
Posts: 409
We have a VCross Platinum 5er. I really don't see any difference in fuel consumption but with the V nose, they really use the space well. We love it. Leaving today for a 12 day trip in the North GA mountains. Curious how the furnace will work in the cold weather. Haven't really needed it yet.
__________________
Glen & Lee
Cleveland, GA : Rochester, NY
2019 Primetime Sanibel 3851
2017 Ford F350 PSD
GlenZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2013, 11:32 AM   #16
Senior Member
 
Capt. Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Franklin County, MO
Posts: 2,652
Quote:
Originally Posted by GlenZ View Post
We have a VCross Platinum 5er. I really don't see any difference in fuel consumption but with the V nose, they really use the space well. We love it. Leaving today for a 12 day trip in the North GA mountains. Curious how the furnace will work in the cold weather. Haven't really needed it yet.
GlenZ, we were in Nashville with our Windjammer at Thanksgiving, when temps got down to 11 degrees. Our furnace plus an auxiliary electric space heater kept it plenty warm at that temperature. Enjoy your trip.
__________________
Mike and Yvonne
and Sophie, the little white dog
2017 Columbus 320RSC
2021 Chevy Silverado 3500HD DRW 4X4 Duramax
“It's not how old you are, it's how you are old.”Jules Renard
"It's not the years...it's the mileage." - Indiana Jones
Capt. Mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2013, 11:36 AM   #17
Senior Member
 
Capt. Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Franklin County, MO
Posts: 2,652
To the OP: The Windjammer and the Flagstaff V-lite offer the same basic floor plans in each model. Difference is in exterior graphics and interior color schemes. Like the GMC and Chevy, these are essentially the same vehicles with minor differences in badging, colors, and trim. Pick which you like, and go enjoy it. We absolutely LOVE our Windjammer 3008 with the front kitchen. Great use of space, and get the kitchen out of the middle of the living area.
__________________
Mike and Yvonne
and Sophie, the little white dog
2017 Columbus 320RSC
2021 Chevy Silverado 3500HD DRW 4X4 Duramax
“It's not how old you are, it's how you are old.”Jules Renard
"It's not the years...it's the mileage." - Indiana Jones
Capt. Mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2014, 06:00 AM   #18
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 13
We have a 2012 windjammer 3002w. Pulling with a 2012 dodge 1500 express 5.7 L hemi. I get 12 mpg at 55 mph. Normal is 16.2 mpg. Not to bad i guess.
dougwb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2014, 02:53 PM   #19
Pirate Todd and Wench
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Pasadena Maryland
Posts: 78
At 12mpg your doing as good as it gets! lol I have the 3008 and get 14 with a F250 diesel, so with gas that sounds about fair. Note: get a bottle jack for tire changes and use it under your drivers side frame between the tires before you tip out....makes a world of difference in leveling and stability! Those tips are huge and it really helps...good luck in your travels.
__________________
-Todd and Sherri
-2006 F250 Super Duty King ranch Diesel
-2012 Windjammer 3008w
-Equilzer 1200lb hitch
mrtodds is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2014, 09:10 PM   #20
Member
 
hockey11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 60
We have had our windjammer for 2 years & love it! We get about 8-10mpg depending on speed & wind. We tow with a f150 ecoboost. Click image for larger version

Name:	ImageUploadedByForest River Forums1398910225.211324.jpg
Views:	148
Size:	50.8 KB
ID:	51327
__________________
Sharon & Jim, Dutchess
Windjammer 2102w
Ford f150 4x4 EB 2014

2012 30, 2013 25, 2014 29, 2015 37
hockey11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


» Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by

Disclaimer:

This website is not affiliated with or endorsed by Forest River, Inc. or any of its affiliates. This is an independent, unofficial site.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:45 AM.