Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-01-2016, 12:56 PM   #41
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 9
LT

Go with LT tires. I have been in an RV since the early 90's and have had my share of tire issues. In 2007 after 6 blowouts from ST tires, I switched to LT. Today 3 campers later, I am still running LT tires and have had great success, knock on wood, not a single tire issue since I switched. I have been running BF Goodrich Commercial TA's on them and I am extremely happy. I currently have a 38 ft Columbus @ 14,000 pounds and there great.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	image.jpg
Views:	47
Size:	605.3 KB
ID:	119144  
__________________

__________________
Kstedman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2016, 01:03 PM   #42
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 9
If you have had the tire problems that we have experienced you would change too. Problem is the campers are too big and heavy for the tires that the factory installs. Out of 7 campers, 12 blowouts and numerous damages to my campers. Thats why I run LT's. They are twice the tire of an ST and surely give you piece of mind when running them VS the will pop ST's.
__________________

__________________
Kstedman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2016, 01:51 PM   #43
Phat Phrog Stunt Team
 
TURBS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Iowa
Posts: 34,422
Good thread!


2015 Columbus 320RS
2008 2500HD Duramax
2015 nights camped "34"
2016 nights camped "32"
__________________
TURBS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2016, 03:07 PM   #44
Senior Member
 
jlgail4309's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Tulsa
Posts: 425
2013 trailer 3 sets of tire in 3 years. Two deformed and 1 blow out . I will be looking for a LT tire to try. Last set was Kumho 857 130.00 at tire and 8 ply. Best tire I could find , One deformed and one blew out.
__________________
-----------------------------------------------------------
2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee Diesel
2013 Salem Cruise light 19bh
Hensley Cub hitch ,
jlgail4309 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2016, 03:33 PM   #45
Senior Member
 
CaptnJohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Ocean Isle Beach NC
Posts: 1,797
Quote:
Originally Posted by Witch Doctor View Post
I really do not think you can just say that even though you just did, I know of many members that will swear that there Maxxis 8008 ST is probably the best ST tire on the Market
I know for a fact that Youroo has ran his old Maxxis for 5 years without even a flat, he or lyrics bought new ones be caused they aged out
Just love you guys that think the only good tire is an LT. That's pretty closed minded. If you like your LT that is great and I'm glad you have them me I will stay with ST, and Maxxis.
I'm staying with ST and Carlisle as Maxxis availability around here sux.
__________________
2016 Keystone Cougar 303RLS
2016 F350 diesel
Edgewater 205 EX 150 Yamaha
CaptnJohn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2016, 04:00 PM   #46
Senior Member
 
Coolharts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Siler City,NC
Posts: 252
Can't find an LT tire in 225/75 R15, I found a Gaurdsman but it could only handle 1700 lbs so not a true LT.
__________________
2017 Surveyor 33RETS with Residential Refrigerator and Inverter
2005 Ford Excursion 6.0L 2WD
Nights Camped 2016 27
Nights Camped 2017 0
Coolharts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2016, 05:47 PM   #47
Senior Member
 
Airdale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 611
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kstedman View Post
Go with LT tires. I have been in an RV since the early 90's and have had my share of tire issues. In 2007 after 6 blowouts from ST tires, I switched to LT. Today 3 campers later, I am still running LT tires and have had great success, knock on wood, not a single tire issue since I switched. I have been running BF Goodrich Commercial TA's on them and I am extremely happy. I currently have a 38 ft Columbus @ 14,000 pounds and there great.
FAQ | Tire Replacement | BFGoodrich Tires
__________________
USN - RET
DOD - RET
SSA - RET
Airdale is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2016, 06:36 PM   #48
Commercial Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Akron, Ohio
Posts: 1,034
Quote:
Originally Posted by Airdale View Post
FR is not the only RV trailer manufacturer that has problems getting the correct information on their trailer’s certification labels.

I watch the recalls and how they are handled. And Tireman9 probably does to, because he mentioned the most common remedy for incorrect GAWR values on the certification label is to deduct what is needed from the cargo label to make it right. Then all they have to do is issue new certification & cargo labels.

Here is a NHTSA quote I often post about cargo. It’s from a NHTSA PDF.

“The FMVSS have requirements for the manufacturer to use proper tires and rims for the gross axle weight rating (GAWR). The manufacturer may determine the GVWR by adding cargo capacity (if any) to the curb weight of the vehicle as manufactured. The wise consumer, before purchase, will determine if the vehicle has sufficient cargo capacity to carry the weight of water, additional equipment (such as televisions, and microwave ovens), and luggage. The manufacturer’s certification label must show the GVWR. The GVWR must not be exceeded by overloading the vehicle. There is little the government can do to assist a consumer who has purchased a vehicle that has insufficient cargo capacity for its intended use.”
Thanks for the quote. So according to NHTSA if consumer bases their purchase decision on the various certification labels, the consumer is wrong to expect the RV to be able to actually carry the calculated capacity? What is a consumer suppose to do when making a purchase decision if not rely on the Federally Regulated and required cert labels?

Suppose an RV was delivered with labels indicating GVWR of 10,000# and GAWR of 4275#. Empty weight (not required on cert label) was 8000 leaving 2000# load capacity.
This puts 14.5% of TT weight on the ball. It is recommended that hitch weight be 10 to 15% of the trailer weight.
So then it is discovered the RV company actually used 3,000# axles and tires. So the NHTSA recall is covered simply with new stickers showing GAWR of 3,000 and of course the much reduced GVWR of maybe 8000 to 8,400# with a new load capacity of 0 to 400#.

Explain how the owner should respond? Will NHTSA say it was the buyer who made it incorrect assumption that the certification labels were correct and simply didn't do proper shopping?

Sorry I don't buy the "Fix" as appropriate if the error is much more than 100# especially if a buyer compares the certification lable number on similar RVs from a variety of different companies or maybe even from the same company.
__________________
.
I write a blog on RV tire application and safety and give seminars on tires at RV events across the US. 40 years experience as tire design & quality engineer for major tire mfg. Freelander 23QB on Chevy chassis is my RV
RV Tire Safety Blog
Tireman9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2016, 07:09 PM   #49
Senior Member
 
CaptnJohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Ocean Isle Beach NC
Posts: 1,797
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kstedman View Post
Go with LT tires. I have been in an RV since the early 90's and have had my share of tire issues. In 2007 after 6 blowouts from ST tires, I switched to LT. Today 3 campers later, I am still running LT tires and have had great success, knock on wood, not a single tire issue since I switched. I have been running BF Goodrich Commercial TA's on them and I am extremely happy. I currently have a 38 ft Columbus @ 14,000 pounds and there great.
I have been towing RVs ~~ TTs mostly, 5ers most recently, and a Class A for a few years since 1974 ~~ 42 years. I have many different problems but never a blow out or even a flat. Always ST tires. At age 68 I've slowed and only pull about 7500 miles annually now.

Hope I did not jinx myself now.
__________________
2016 Keystone Cougar 303RLS
2016 F350 diesel
Edgewater 205 EX 150 Yamaha
CaptnJohn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2016, 08:30 PM   #50
Commercial Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Akron, Ohio
Posts: 1,034
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coolharts View Post
Can't find an LT tire in 225/75 R15, I found a Gaurdsman but it could only handle 1700 lbs so not a true LT.

If your tires are ST225/75R15 you will not find an LT 225/75R15 that will support the same load unless you go up at least two Load Range and maybe not even then.

Many times the switch from ST to LT requires an increase in size and probably also an increase in Load Range. Wwhich and how much you have to change will depend on your starting point.

Sorry but no simple single answer as it depends on your measured loading too.
__________________

__________________
.
I write a blog on RV tire application and safety and give seminars on tires at RV events across the US. 40 years experience as tire design & quality engineer for major tire mfg. Freelander 23QB on Chevy chassis is my RV
RV Tire Safety Blog
Tireman9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
tire, tires

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




» Virginia Campgrounds

Reviews provided by




ForestRiverForums.com is not in any way associated with Forest River, Inc. or its associated RV manufacturing divisions.

Our Communities

Our communities encompass many different hobbies and interests, but each one is built on friendly, intelligent membership.

» More about our Communities

Automotive Communities

Our Automotive communities encompass many different makes and models. From U.S. domestics to European Saloons.

» More about our Automotive Communities

Marine Communities

Our Marine websites focus on Cruising and Sailing Vessels, including forums and the largest cruising Wiki project on the web today.

» More about our Marine Communities


Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:28 PM.