Forest River Forums
Sunline User Photos


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-30-2011, 08:59 AM   #1
Senior Member
 
Traveler II's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Lindstrom, MN
Posts: 143
More Power

I’ll be the first to admit that I’ve not the most mechanically minded, so please explain in simple terms.

We have a 2008 Chevy Duramax. We have about 50,000 miles on it and it’s done a great job of pulling our rig. We would like to increase the power and also the mileage.

I’ve read about adding “chips” also I’ve read about some different products that Banks makes to improve what I’m asking for. From your experience what is a good way to go to meet our objectives? What works, and what doesn’t?

__________________
Jim and Jane
2008 Cardinal 30TS
Trail Air Pin Box, Center Point Suspension
Reese 18K hitch - Garmin 1690 GPS
2008 Chevy 2500HD 4x4 Duramax/Allison, Long Box, Smartair
Nights camped in 2011: 120
Traveler II is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2011, 09:29 AM   #2
Member
 
sreddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 95
In real simple terms - if you improve (increase) air in along with available fuel (large injectors) & remove restrictions on exhaust you will more available power and potentially better fuel economy. To get there you can add large turbo's & inter-coolers, larger fuel injectors & high pressure fuel pumps (& coolers) to finish that you add free flowing exhaust (larger diameter pipes etc) then to manage all of these changes you modify the vehicle computer (the "CHIP" changes).
The CHIP only changes modify the computer for fuel flow, timing, transmission shift points and other computer controlled setting & do improve performance but CAN have negative impact on component life.
As you increase power you also need to know what you transmission, torque converter etc can handle, will your oil pan/ oil pump be large enough is your radiator capable of the increased heat etc. As well, do you have the gauges you need to monitor the upgrades and know what the readings mean
IMHO find out the base specs for your setup then look at what each type of modification offers along with any draw backs - research is the key and is available for the layman from the better vendors.

Some links:
The Diesel Page - for the 6.2L, 6.5L, and Duramax Diesel 6600 GM Chevrolet and GMC light-truck diesel engines
TheDieselPage.com article - BD's Diesel Performance Engineering, May 2005
Bully Dog Technologies
Banks Power | Diesel Trucks, Chevy/GMC
oppinions on the best programmer - Chevy and GMC Duramax Diesel Forum

cheers

__________________
2011 SP-293
2003 F-250 4x4 SD Super Cab
sreddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2011, 10:11 AM   #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Manitoba
Posts: 1,285
If your truck has done "a great job", don't mess with it.
A neighbour chipped his truck, and has had nothing but problems ever since, very expensive problems. Of course he is one of these idiots who thinks his diesel is a race truck.
You could probably get away with a very mild chip, and maybe get a bit better fuel mileage. But look at what you are pulling, you can't expect too much improvement.
On our old truck, I did replace the very poor exhaust system, but I am not about to sacrifice the durability of the engine just so I can get to my destination a few minutes sooner. I don't think any of us are in that big of a hurry.
__________________
crocus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2011, 11:00 AM   #4
Now a "Top Member"
 
EdJunior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Roman Forest, TX
Posts: 573
I guess my first question would be, after 50,000 miles of doing a great job, why do you think you need more power? I believe that to get enough of a "noticeable" power increase, you would probably spend more than you get in return. Generally, when you increase power, you are NOT going to increase mileage. Any mileage gains, at least when towing the 5er will be minimal, and again, will it be worth the cost in the end.

But, those are my opinions only. Look at the options, then look at the ROI (return on investment).
__________________
Ed and Sharon
2010 Wildcat 28RKBS
2011 Ford F-250 XLT, 6.7L PSD
Ride-Rite Airbags and Airlift wireless remote compressor...nice!

I thought I was wrong once, but I was wrong!
EdJunior is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2011, 11:11 AM   #5
Member
 
samsc03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Virginia beach
Posts: 84
But fellas keep in mind there are times when increasing power in midrange is way better than increasing the power at redline. The top end power claims are meaningless to me of all the aftermarket modifications out there, I want to know where we drive and tow what the gains are.
If you have more power then previously you have to can make it work less to do the same as before. I.e my performance towing with the little v-6 gets way better mileage than anyone could guess without knowing the modifications. Almost 12-14 on camping trips honestly. My speedo is off by a small amount and I know that I calculate 11.5 on refueling just about everytime. I added more air and fuel to my engine by supercharging and fueling and timing properly. Very calculating and expensive on a vehicle not normally modified. It works and reliability only suffers a minute amount but being I did it I can fix it too.

But in my opinion if the truck works now keep it that way.

Sam and Tonya
__________________
2011 Shamrock 19
2003 Toyota Tacoma V6 4wd
Tekonsha Voyager
Equal-I-zer
samsc03 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2011, 11:26 AM   #6
Lou Amadio
 
herk7769's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Southeastern PA
Posts: 6,321
I think the engineers at the major truck design labs know what is best for their products as a "system." They are ultimately responsible for making sure the individual components made by many manufacturers WORK TOGETHER. That is why they are called System Engineers.

While modifications to a component may improve the performance of that component, be it engine, trans, or other; you become the system integrator and responsible for what mayhem ensues.

Perhaps better breathing will increase horsepower at the expense of more heat. Now radiator is undersized for cooling your beast. This results in increased coolant temps, which causes the trans fluid to not cool sufficiently, which causes early transmission failure. While not a predicted outcome, it is certainly a possibility.

Leave well enough alone, IMO.
__________________

Lou and Laura Amadio and Bella the German Short Hair Pointer
2008 GMC Sierra 2500HD Crewcab SB Allison Duramax
2010 Flagstaff 8526RLWS 5th Wheel Pullrite Hitch
(2009: 28) (2010: 74) (2011: 93) (2012: 7)
herk7769 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2011, 11:58 AM   #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 212
What Herk said X2!
We have a similar truck...I asked the same uestions about chips when I got it. Not one person that has used them would do it again, not the gains they wanted...and it cost a bunch of bucks!
Jack
__________________
2006 Flagstaff 831RLSS Travel Trailer

2007 Chevy 2500HD 'Classic' with the Duramax engine.

Converting a 1956 GMC PD4501 Scenicruiser, ex Greyhound into a motor home.
jackhartjr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2011, 12:06 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
Traveler II's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Lindstrom, MN
Posts: 143
Thanks gang, the reason I thought I needed more power is we have a new fiver on order that is about 900# more than the rig we have now. Our Chevy the way it is has done a good job. I best wait and see what's its going to be with the new rig. What I'm reading is its best to leave well enough alone.

Again thanks for the help.
__________________
Jim and Jane
2008 Cardinal 30TS
Trail Air Pin Box, Center Point Suspension
Reese 18K hitch - Garmin 1690 GPS
2008 Chevy 2500HD 4x4 Duramax/Allison, Long Box, Smartair
Nights camped in 2011: 120
Traveler II is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2011, 02:08 PM   #9
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 212
Ours weighs somewhere in the 7,000 pound range. We get about 10 to 12MPG depending on how I drive it, it almost doesn't matter if that is going to FL in the flats or in the NC mountains.
Jack
__________________
2006 Flagstaff 831RLSS Travel Trailer

2007 Chevy 2500HD 'Classic' with the Duramax engine.

Converting a 1956 GMC PD4501 Scenicruiser, ex Greyhound into a motor home.
jackhartjr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2011, 03:02 PM   #10
Lou Amadio
 
herk7769's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Southeastern PA
Posts: 6,321
When it comes to money, sex, and gas mileage... Everyone Lies.

However, from fireside chats with other Chevy/GMC 2500HD Duramax drivers who are towing everything from 7000 pound ultra-ultra-lites to big Montana's and other 15-16,000 pound monsters, they all seem to say they get 11-13 MPG. I run about 11.5 on average with my 2008 GMC 2500HD with Duramax and Allison trans towing my 9200 pound Flagstaff.
Your results may vary

__________________

Lou and Laura Amadio and Bella the German Short Hair Pointer
2008 GMC Sierra 2500HD Crewcab SB Allison Duramax
2010 Flagstaff 8526RLWS 5th Wheel Pullrite Hitch
(2009: 28) (2010: 74) (2011: 93) (2012: 7)
herk7769 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




» Online Users: 531
87 members and 444 guests
4kmprs, acadianbob, Adony, armcor02, Barnman1, bidesheng, bjlowe, blaisrv, Bruce and Lynn, bub71351, buccello, bumper, caleb, Capsfloyd, COcamper, Coops1, Cowracer, dashonthedash, Dave_Monica, ddemme, DonG, dunnnc, Elidh, firemanrod, flc, Frank4, gimp425, grhodes50, Hilgy, hjmiberry, House97, Hydrothunder, Iggy, imabmwnut, itech, J McClure, JamesR, JDWeir, JoeR, jonnys_walkers, J_King, kb4srn, ke5wdq, Kirby, klucas, LeonFournier, majag86, mbrwr, meatguy, mlhalter, MN128S, myredracer, N3HCP, newtsx3, NO3putt, papadawg78, papamcgown, partime, pg_rider, Phil57, punkaccountant, redfox217, rerger, ret2006, rkswyo, robert elling, rwhmtnfolks, sandys, Scooter2, scooterho, sfrye5853, Skeet, smcneil, Smithee, Sparky44, sprayking, SpringerPop, sundawg, Taranwanderer, Terier, Triguy, troyt, vasnipe, VinceU, wagon52, Whiteknight, wingriders
Most users ever online was 1,025, Today at 01:04 PM.


ForestRiverForums.com is not in any way associated with Forest River, Inc. or its associated RV manufacturing divisions.

Our Communities

Our communities encompass many different hobbies and interests, but each one is built on friendly, intelligent membership.

» More about our Communities

Automotive Communities

Our Automotive communities encompass many different makes and models. From U.S. domestics to European Saloons.

» More about our Automotive Communities

RV & Travel Trailer Communities

Our RV & Travel Trailer sites encompasses virtually all types of Recreational Vehicles, from brand-specific to general RV communities.

» More about our RV Communities

Marine Communities

Our Marine websites focus on Cruising and Sailing Vessels, including forums and the largest cruising Wiki project on the web today.

» More about our Marine Communities


Copyright 2002-2012 Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:10 PM.


Forest River RV News right to your Email!

Stay up-to-date with Forest River news to your inbox

unsusbcribe at anytime with one click

Close [X]