 |
|
08-14-2011, 09:31 AM
|
#31
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Virginia Blue Ridge Foothills
Posts: 4,017
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheSasks
Chap,
Some vehicles do get better mileage towing running higher octane, we use mid grade 89 if we can get or high if not. The reason is simply the higher octane keeps the engine from detonating under load and which causes the computer to richen the mixture and pull timing out so you get less power and more fuel burnt.
|
Makes sense.
__________________
Chap & DW Joy in Ruckersville, VA.
2006 Ford F150 Super Cab 4x4
2008 Surveyor 263
|
|
|
08-14-2011, 09:35 AM
|
#32
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Lake Charles, La.
Posts: 1,213
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheSasks
Chap,
Some vehicles do get better mileage towing running higher octane, we use mid grade 89 if we can get or high if not. The reason is simply the higher octane keeps the engine from detonating under load and which causes the computer to richen the mixture and pull timing out so you get less power and more fuel burnt.
|
that's it. octane rating is a ping measurement. in the very old days, they put lead in to smooth out the explosion. not sure what ethanol will do. it is interesting on how some additives will increase octane in small amts but go the other way in larger amts.
__________________
|
|
|
08-14-2011, 09:50 AM
|
#33
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Hilton NY
Posts: 196
|
I'm also using the Superchips tuner. The tow program is tuned to run at least 91 octane. I always use that when I tow and I still got better MPG.
__________________
Doug
2011 Prime Time Tracer 3000BHS
2007 Ford Expedition
Reese Dual Cam HP Hitch
|
|
|
08-14-2011, 10:07 AM
|
#34
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Moose Jaw, Saskatchewan
Posts: 1,278
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DF5.4
I'm also using the Superchips tuner. The tow program is tuned to run at least 91 octane. I always use that when I tow and I still got better MPG.
|
I would expect you would. So at the very least their programmer seems to work as advertised for you. I have been mulling over getting one for our truck but have not seen anything too conclusive to say it was worth it for a daily driver/TV.
__________________

John & Deb
2008 Dodge Ram 2500 4x4 Laramie Hemi Megacab
2011 Flagstaff V-Lite 30WRLS
|
|
|
 |
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Threads |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Online Users: 529 |
| 82 members and 447 guests |
| 4kmprs, acadianbob, Adony, armcor02, Barnman1, BeagleIL, bidesheng, bjlowe, Bruce and Lynn, bub71351, buccello, bumper, caleb, Capsfloyd, COcamper, Coops1, Cowracer, dashonthedash, Dave_Monica, ddemme, DonG, dunnnc, Elidh, flc, Frank4, grhodes50, Hilgy, hjmiberry, House97, Hydrothunder, Iggy, imabmwnut, itech, J McClure, JamesR, JDWeir, JoeR, jonnys_walkers, J_King, kb4srn, ke5wdq, Kirby, klucas, LeonFournier, majag86, meatguy, mlhalter, MN128S, myredracer, N3HCP, newtsx3, NO3putt, papadawg78, papamcgown, pg_rider, Phil57, polkatronron, punkaccountant, redfox217, rerger, ret2006, rkswyo, robert elling, rwhmtnfolks, sandys, scooterho, sfrye5853, Skeet, smcneil, Smithee, Sparky44, sprayking, SpringerPop, sundawg, Taranwanderer, Terier, Triguy, troyt, vasnipe, wagon52, Whiteknight, wingriders |
| Most users ever online was 1,025, Today at 01:04 PM. |
|