Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-28-2016, 12:41 PM   #21
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by KMP44 View Post
And my next truck will have at least a 34 gallon tank for sure. Glad to see Ford is offering bigger tanks on all the new trucks. 2017 F-250 cc long bed has a 48 gallon tank. That would fix the stop every 2 hours problem! Of course then we would need a new thread to complain about the cost of fill-up.
My wife, kids and little dogs can't go that long without having to pee

I was getting 6-7mpg towing out TT with a 1/2 ton Dodge; moving to a diesel got us up to 10-11mpg but the difference in POWER is no comparison.
__________________
2006 Ford F-350
2014 Wildwood 28DBUD
Pick_PSD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2016, 12:46 PM   #22
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 41
I looked up the tire diameter differance on several sites the following one www.tacomaworld.com/tirecalc?tires=255-70r17 vs. 285-70r17
indicates 255X70/R17 = 31.06 dia.
285X70R17 = 32.71 dia A difference of 1.65" and a 5.3% charge. according to the chart at 65 MPH you would be trying to go 68.4 MPH if high gear = 1 to 1
using that info shows you should be seeing 2370 RPM at 65, if tranni is in high gear.
Burk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2016, 12:51 PM   #23
Senior Member
 
KMP44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Central New York
Posts: 1,165
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pick_PSD View Post
My wife, kids and little dogs can't go that long without having to pee
Same here - so even with a bigger tank and better mileage, we probably will end up stopping every 2 hours anyway.
__________________



2022 Columbus 379MBC (Previous 2013 Rockwood Roo 23 IKSS)
2023 F-350 (Previous 2017 F250, 2005 F-150)
KMP44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2016, 12:51 PM   #24
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 41
RPM, Speed, gear ratio

I looked up the tire diameter differance on several sites the following one www.tacomaworld.com/tirecalc?tires=255-70r17 vs. 285-70r17
indicates 255X70/R17 = 31.06 dia.
285X70R17 = 32.71 dia A difference of 1.65" and a 5.3% charge. according to the chart at 65 MPH you would be trying to go 68.4 MPH if high gear = 1 to 1
using that info shows you should be seeing 2370 RPM at 65, if tranni is in high gear.
Burk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2016, 12:53 PM   #25
Senior Member
 
thebrakeman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Canton, Michigan
Posts: 1,348
I think '06 was the year before F150 went to a more efficient 6-speed auto. Welcome to camping! I get 8-9 mph, depending on whether freeway speeds, or 2-lane speeds.
__________________
thebrakeman ('70), DW ('71), DD ('99), DD ('01), DD ('05)
2004 Surveyor SV261T (UltraLite Bunkhouse Hybrid)
2006 Mercury Mountaineer V8 AWD Premier
Equal-i-zer WDH (10k), Prodigy Brake Controller
thebrakeman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2016, 01:13 PM   #26
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Shenandoah Valley, VA
Posts: 515
I wouldn't go by just using the needle on the gas gauge to figure mileage. I've had vehicles that would go from full to half in 100 miles. Then would get 200 miles from 1/2 to empty. The way I figure it is fill up, set my trip meter to zero, when i fill up again I divide the miles by the number of gallons used to refill.
__________________
2016 Flagstaff 23LB
howie70 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2016, 01:25 PM   #27
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 832
We just finished our first long trip with our TT. We went from Central MD to Cape Hatteras. I have a 2011 F150 EB SCAB with 3.55 rear and airlift 5000's. I got 11-12 down and 9-10 back. Heavy tail wind down and head winds coming back.

It's typical from what I can tell.

Marty
__________________
2016 Rockwood 2703WS Sapphire
2016 F250 SD 6.2L
Martsing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2016, 01:38 PM   #28
Senior Member
 
Major Oz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 219
I'm pulling a new Flagstaff 26FKWS with a 2012 F-150 Ecoboost. Most recent trip was 2800 miles.....9.1 mpg for the trip.

Like walking uphill both ways to school (in the snow) as a kid, I seemed to be bucking headwinds everywhere.....spending four days on an island in NW Houston TX (17.1 inches in 10 hours....heh,heh....checking for leaks).

So....to the question:

My sweet spot seems to be about 62 mph -- kinda where air resistance, shift points, mileage, and power seem to cross.

In defiance of conventional wisdom, I am running a 3.31 rear end. Sounds horrid for towing, but ..... that's why god made transmissions: to choose your gears.

We are blue highway types and hit interstates for no more than a couple hundred miles on the trip. Owned big clunky motorhomes and tight little TT's for 40+ years. We think (hope) we have finally found the ideal combo, though may update TV from time to time.

For us, RV'ing is not a destination, but the travel....lots of roses to smell out there (even played music at Luchenback last week).
__________________
2014 King Ranch Ecoboost Screw, 3.73.....2019 Palamino 27RLSS (customized)
Retired AF Mustang.....Picker always looking to jam.
Major Oz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2016, 01:44 PM   #29
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 93
bad mileage

Pulling a 29' (26' box) Surveyor ('07 model) with a '99 Silverado 5.3 on hilly upstate SC roads got me 6mpg.
I upgraded to a '05 F250 6.0 diesel and now get about 12. Pulls a lot better and no white knuckles. 4 door to boot.
53jimc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2016, 01:53 PM   #30
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: South Georgia
Posts: 75
These are interesting post. I currently have a 2003 F150 4x4 with added heavy springs pulling a Grey Wolf 26DBH. My RPM on rolling hills never exceeds 2200-2300 RPM. I haven't pulled in the real hills yet and probably will not. But, from what I have seen, I have been getting 11-12 MPG on the open road. 15-16 MPG not pulling the trailer. I can't imagine RPMs of 3200. That would make me nervous.
__________________
2016 Grey Wolf 26DBH
Ram 2500 5.7 Hemi 4WD
gconley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2016, 02:14 PM   #31
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Mahwah, NJ
Posts: 103
Can't speak to MPG pulling a TT (mine is a Sunseeker), but I can tell you that going from 30" tires to 33" tires on your tow vehicle will tend to mess with things.

Things like speed, calculated load, throttle angle, etc. are all part of the algorithm that the computer uses to decide when to shift (up or down). Having larger than stock tires will cause the truck to think it's travelling more slowly than it actually is. The larger circumference will also change the effective final drive ratio, making it "longer". This will result in the engine and transmission having to work harder than it otherwise would to pull your TT, which will have a negative effect on your fuel consumption. Think about if you jumped on a 10 speed bike that's in a high gear...you have to work pretty hard just to get going. Once you're up to speed, it's OK, but getting there uses a lot more energy (and causes more component wear) than it would if you started in a lower gear.

Here are some options:

-Do nothing at all and enjoy it as is! Pros...your truck looks cooler than stock, and this option doesn't cost you a thing! Cons...your gas mileage won't meet your expectations (which can always be re-adjusted!), and your truck will be working harder than it should. This is really only an issue when you're towing...you're unlikely to overtax anything during your daily commute, regardless of how big your tires are.

-If you like the look of the oversized tires:
At a minimum, you should find a tuner or re-flash module to correct the speedometer. This will correct the "speed" part of the shift algorithm which will improve your shift points (the computer will be making decisions on correct information). Pros...your truck will still look cooler than stock. Cons...it won't change the fact that your drivetrain is working harder than normal, and is unlikely to have any real effect on fuel consumption.

-You can change the differential gearset ratio, which will compensate for the increased tire circumference to bring your final drive ratio back to "stock" with the larger tires. Pros...your truck will still look cooler than stock, you'll get better gas mileage since the drivetrain isn't working so hard, and (in theory) the engine and transmission will last longer. Cons...you'll still have to re-flash the computer so the truck knows how fast it's actually going, and changing the gears is expensive (especially if it's 4WD).

-If you're not "in love" with the oversized tires:
Get a set of stock sized tires and be done with it. Pros...your truck will operate as designed, which should be an improvement in gas mileage and seat of the pants power over your current condition. Cons...your truck will look like everyone elses.

You learn a lot about the effects of upsizing your tires when your toad is a Jeep Wrangler....
rad_jr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2016, 02:18 PM   #32
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Western New York
Posts: 1,331
The 2006 F150 should have the 4 speed auto transmission with either the 4.6 or 5.4 engine.

The past work truck was a 2007 F150 with the 5.4 and 3:55 axles. Towing a 3,000 lb 12X5 cargo trailer it would get in the 9-10 range. We updated the trailer to a 7,000 lb 16X7 cargo trailer and mileage was in the 6-9 range. Also found truck to be in 3rd gear more often. Gas tank was only 26 gallons.
__________________
2014 Coachmen Pursuit 31BDP
2016 Ford C-Max Energi
1987 Chrysler LeBaron Convertible
FROG Member
FMCA Member #F438633 - Good Sam Life Member
Coachmens Owners Group Member
ResQfrog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2016, 02:22 PM   #33
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,002
If you have 3.55s and 33" you basically dropped the rear gears to 3.25. Way too low for towing. You have a loss of power and need more gas to tow. Hence the bad MPG.
The 5.4 is kinda doggy to begin with and running basically a 3.25 rear with those 33s is why you're having trouble.
As cool as the 33s probably look I'd go back to the stock size or jump to a 4.30 gear set. If you have 4wd then that's going to be $1500-2000 for a gear swap.
I think I'd just get stock tires for that much $$$$.
I towed a lighter but similar sized Tt with an 08 F150 3.73 gears and consistently got around 10.5 towing all over Oregon and NorCal.
I too had a tranny shudder @ around 45-50mph. My F150 was all stock. I didn't notice it when towing. Just when accelerating empty and from 45-50MPH. Nothing below or over those speeds.
goduc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2016, 02:28 PM   #34
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Franklin County, PA
Posts: 3,526
I have a 2002 f150 screw 5.4l engine 3.55 rear. I get average between 6-10 mpg while towing. I have a cap on back of truck so I think that helps me itch drag some. My dry weight is 4470 gross is 7770. It averages around 15-18 mpg when not towing.
__________________
2019 Puma XLE 27QBC Toy Hauler
2005 Honda VTX 1300
2002 Goldwing 1800GL CSC Trike
2020 Ram 2500 Crew cab 6.5 bed

Ron & Shirley (Empty Nesters)
rmac04401 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2016, 02:51 PM   #35
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,002
Had a rear cap on mine also. I too think that helps some. Also my TT was only 9'9"H.
goduc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2016, 02:56 PM   #36
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Canada
Posts: 25
Welcome to the comforts of a travel trailer.....no setup, full washroom, no sleeping on the ground. I've been towing RV trailers for 20 years, in fact had the same one for 15 years and towed it with 3 different vehicles. Astro van with 4.3L/3.73, Trailblazer 5.4L/3.73 and F150 3.5 Eco/3.73. Every one of them got the same mileage 8-10mpg. Now towing a Flagstaff 8289WS with Eco 3.5 and still get same mileage. Wind resistance kills mileage, especially with gas engines. On an empty road trip I can get over a 1000Km (over 600 miles), towing its cut in half. Want your mileage back....buy a tent.
Steamfitter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2016, 03:37 PM   #37
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Franklin County, PA
Posts: 3,526
Consider the lower gas mileage a trade off for convienence over tent, and savings over hotel ing it and eating out all the time and not sleeping in your own bed.
__________________
2019 Puma XLE 27QBC Toy Hauler
2005 Honda VTX 1300
2002 Goldwing 1800GL CSC Trike
2020 Ram 2500 Crew cab 6.5 bed

Ron & Shirley (Empty Nesters)
rmac04401 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2016, 04:39 PM   #38
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 43
This is kind of the mindset I have - and seeing the earlier post regarding what my RPMs should be based on tire size, I am leaning toward starting with a reflash of the tire size. I did find a Superchip Tuner for 150.00 that if it doesn't work I can easily resell, so worth a shot.

I am going off the VIN in regards to me gearing being a 3:55, and it is an 06, so the TOW button I don't believe was an option with the tow package. I have to assume it is a factory tow kit since it has Ford branded parts on it, the bars that are welded to the frame for additional support, the trans cooler, and the wiring all in place for 7 plug and a brake controller that is all factory wrapped and positioned.

We have our first Mini trip next weekend, only about 90 Minutes away, but I will run some numbers for the gas starting this trip, then we have one that is 5.5 hours away at the end of May that will be a full test

Styg


Quote:
Originally Posted by rad_jr View Post
Can't speak to MPG pulling a TT (mine is a Sunseeker), but I can tell you that going from 30" tires to 33" tires on your tow vehicle will tend to mess with things.

Things like speed, calculated load, throttle angle, etc. are all part of the algorithm that the computer uses to decide when to shift (up or down). Having larger than stock tires will cause the truck to think it's travelling more slowly than it actually is. The larger circumference will also change the effective final drive ratio, making it "longer". This will result in the engine and transmission having to work harder than it otherwise would to pull your TT, which will have a negative effect on your fuel consumption. Think about if you jumped on a 10 speed bike that's in a high gear...you have to work pretty hard just to get going. Once you're up to speed, it's OK, but getting there uses a lot more energy (and causes more component wear) than it would if you started in a lower gear.

Here are some options:

-Do nothing at all and enjoy it as is! Pros...your truck looks cooler than stock, and this option doesn't cost you a thing! Cons...your gas mileage won't meet your expectations (which can always be re-adjusted!), and your truck will be working harder than it should. This is really only an issue when you're towing...you're unlikely to overtax anything during your daily commute, regardless of how big your tires are.

-If you like the look of the oversized tires:
At a minimum, you should find a tuner or re-flash module to correct the speedometer. This will correct the "speed" part of the shift algorithm which will improve your shift points (the computer will be making decisions on correct information). Pros...your truck will still look cooler than stock. Cons...it won't change the fact that your drivetrain is working harder than normal, and is unlikely to have any real effect on fuel consumption.

-You can change the differential gearset ratio, which will compensate for the increased tire circumference to bring your final drive ratio back to "stock" with the larger tires. Pros...your truck will still look cooler than stock, you'll get better gas mileage since the drivetrain isn't working so hard, and (in theory) the engine and transmission will last longer. Cons...you'll still have to re-flash the computer so the truck knows how fast it's actually going, and changing the gears is expensive (especially if it's 4WD).

-If you're not "in love" with the oversized tires:
Get a set of stock sized tires and be done with it. Pros...your truck will operate as designed, which should be an improvement in gas mileage and seat of the pants power over your current condition. Cons...your truck will look like everyone elses.

You learn a lot about the effects of upsizing your tires when your toad is a Jeep Wrangler....
Stygshore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2016, 05:55 PM   #39
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 43
When I slap the 16' Madriver Canoe and a rack on the truck, 2 bikes, a campchef stove and accessories, and a load of firewood... I might be lucky to get 4mpg

Styg
Stygshore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2016, 06:07 PM   #40
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 10,907
Just doing some basic math, if your tires were exactly 33" OD and 30" OD, the circumference difference is exactly 10%. Therefore, if you have the 33" tires on and your speedo said you were doing 65 mph, then in fact, you would actually be doing 65 +6.5 = 71.5 mph, IF the speedo has not been adjusted. That's definitely enough to see the mileage you're seeing. Most of us tow at 62-ish, or about 15% below what you're doing.

My advice - SLOW DOWN.

If you want to try 62.5 mph, about where most of us try to keep it, your indicated speed should be 56.25 mph.
__________________
1988 Coleman Sequoia - popup (1987-2009) - outlasted 3 Dodge Grand Caravans!
2012 Roo19 - hybrid (2012-2015)

2016 Mini Lite 2503S - tt (2015 - ???)
2011 Traverse LT, 3.6L, FWD
2009 Silverado 1500 Ext Cab, 5.3L, 4x4, 3.73
2016 Silverado 2500HD Dbl Cab, 6.0L 4x4, 4.10
rockfordroo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
23ss, hybrid, towing


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


» Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by

Disclaimer:

This website is not affiliated with or endorsed by Forest River, Inc. or any of its affiliates. This is an independent, unofficial site.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:33 PM.