|
|
04-04-2017, 10:52 AM
|
#1
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 90
|
Relocate batteries to rear bumper
Hi,
Am new to the forums, the site is a great resource.
I'm doing my second RV Solar project on a newly acquired SP295BHS and I'm considering putting the batteries (4 golf cart) on the back bumper. The benefits in my mind are: - Get some weight off the front, so as I use the front storage that I stay in a reasonable tongue weight range, Durango's tongue weight limit is 720 lbs which isn't a problem if managed well.
- Allows me to run the solar on the rear portion of the RV and avoid a long run to the battery bank
- The fridge vent seems to be a popular way to get the power down from the roof and this, again, pushes one to the back end of the RV for the batteries
- While using a rear storage compartment for the batteries is possible if sealed and vented possible I don't want to loose the space, and hydrogen in a worst case scenario under a kid's bed is a terrible scenario. The weight would be all on the one back corner which isn't great.
Several issues come up: - Collision, has anybody heard any rules against batteries on the back bumper? Common sense implications are welcome as well.
- Weight, at 70 lbs or so far a golf cart battery I'll be adding 280 lbs plus the weight of a box on the rear bumper...thoughts?
- Need to figure out how to get the 12V lead from the front bumper pulled back and into the rear of the unit.
My expectation is that having 280 lbs on the rear bumper will afford the addition of ~140 lbs on the front to stay within the factory delivered 550-600lbs. This will allow for a reasonable amount of weight to be added ~110 lbs for loaded propane tanks plus a few smaller items. Anything thereafter will need to be balanced with 2/3 going behind the axles and 1/3 in front.
The factory ratio of tongue weight is only ~10% on the hitch, at the scale it was 705 lbs with a single 12v battery and some propane in the tanks, this was 12%.
|
|
|
04-04-2017, 10:57 AM
|
#2
|
Site Team
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 15,302
|
That is too much weight to put on the rear bumper.
__________________
2015 Freedom Express 248RBS
TV 2015 Silverado HD2500 Duramax
TST Tire Monitors
Honda 2000I + Companion
2 100W solar panels
|
|
|
04-04-2017, 11:11 AM
|
#3
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 161
|
Don't do it..... The problem with putting that much weight on the back and removing weight from the front is that you end up with trailer sway problems. There is a few good videos out there that show the adverse affects produced when weight is not distributed properly in a trailer...
__________________
2017 Surveyor 245BHS
2011 F250 6.2L Crew SB 4X4
|
|
|
04-04-2017, 11:12 AM
|
#4
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 90
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flybob
That is too much weight to put on the rear bumper.
|
It may be, but how do we explain this? I don't have a built in extendable rear platform like some RV's do, and I presume they are reinforced. Or, maybe not.
|
|
|
04-04-2017, 11:17 AM
|
#5
|
(Dry Huunday)
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Eastern North Carolina
Posts: 2,298
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flybob
That is too much weight to put on the rear bumper.
|
X2
You would have to reinforce/rebuild the entire bumper and mounts. Not saying it can't be done but if done correctly you would add a lot of weight back there.
and then there is the collision factor you brought up.....Being in the front the batteries are fairly protected from minor accidents. If you move them to the back you would need to build some protection for them and that would also add weight.....just a thought.
But whatever you decide keep us informed.....we love mods!
__________________
Beau & Sue
FurKid Express
2015 Coachmen Catalina 303RLS
2016 Chevy Silverado LT 2500HD Duramax
The more people I meet, the more I like my dogs!
|
|
|
04-04-2017, 11:42 AM
|
#6
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 10,833
|
just try this. Take your propane tanks off. Put 6 cinder or cement blocks in the back of the trailer. Fill the water tank too. Go for a ride and watch the back end of the trailer sway all over the place. That should make you mind up pretty quick.
|
|
|
04-04-2017, 12:37 PM
|
#7
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 2,024
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by B and B
just try this. Take your propane tanks off. Put 6 cinder or cement blocks in the back of the trailer. Fill the water tank too. Go for a ride and watch the back end of the trailer sway all over the place. That should make you mind up pretty quick.
|
Maybe add... Do it on a lightly travelled road so as not to cause an accident...
|
|
|
04-04-2017, 01:18 PM
|
#8
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Oregon
Posts: 716
|
I believe that this idea COULD be done very responsibly even when considering the shortcomings of the typical TT back "bumper", and the weight balance issues.
When adding weight to the rear, and then also the front (because "now you can"), pay close attention to the total CCC of your trailer (and TV).
I envision the batteries lined end to end across the back of the trailer, in order to keep the weight ABOVE the bumper, as opposed to hanging out beyond it. This would reduce or possibly eliminate the need for reinforcement. Century Plastics makes nice battery boxes that could be used like this (2 batteries per box) Century Plastics: White Heavy Duty Battery Box - (part#: GCE-G)
Blue Sea Systems makes a very nice terminal mounted battery fuse that could be utilized to increase safety in the event of a rear end collision. https://www.bluesea.com/products/519...k_-_30_to_300A
__________________
'04 GMC Sierra 2500HD, CCSB, D/A, MaxBrake, B&W Companion, Retrax Pro, AR Power Steps
2021 Solitude 310GK w/FBP
1969 Camaro RS/SS Convertible
Dad's old 1968 Empi Imp (recently recovered from under 21 years worth of boxes/dust)
|
|
|
04-04-2017, 01:23 PM
|
#9
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 2,024
|
Not withstanding, I believe there might be a safety issue with batteries mounted on a back bumper. In a rear end crash, battery acid spewing all over could be a big issue.
It is after all a bumper, not a battery carrier.
|
|
|
04-04-2017, 01:36 PM
|
#10
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 90
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenImp
I believe that this idea COULD be done very responsibly even when considering the shortcomings of the typical TT back "bumper", and the weight balance issues.
When adding weight to the rear, and then also the front (because "now you can"), pay close attention to the total CCC of your trailer (and TV).
I envision the batteries lined end to end across the back of the trailer, in order to keep the weight ABOVE the bumper, as opposed to hanging out beyond it. This would reduce or possibly eliminate the need for reinforcement. Century Plastics makes nice battery boxes that could be used like this (2 batteries per box) Century Plastics: White Heavy Duty Battery Box - (part#: GCE-G)
Blue Sea Systems makes a very nice terminal mounted battery fuse that could be utilized to increase safety in the event of a rear end collision. https://www.bluesea.com/products/519...k_-_30_to_300A
|
Indeed, I planned on building a battery box something like this:
https://www.etrailer.com/Accessories...FQ6raQod9fYF_g Yes, it would be additional weight as well.
To me this is about weight distribution, which is what most of the posts are concerned about. But, I'm not sure they make sense. The wheels are roughly 1/3 of the length from the rear of the RV, thus having 280 lbs on the rear (+box) would require ~140 in the front storage to compensate. Probably 160 lbs if you account for the removal of the single twelve volt battery.
The alternative is that I put the batteries out front and pack everything else into the bunk room...I'd have to put 560 lbs back there to counteract the batteries....
Good call on the fuse to aid in the event of collision.
|
|
|
04-04-2017, 01:45 PM
|
#11
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 90
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikakuja
Don't do it..... The problem with putting that much weight on the back and removing weight from the front is that you end up with trailer sway problems. There is a few good videos out there that show the adverse affects produced when weight is not distributed properly in a trailer...
|
Understood, one objective is to retain the usefulness of the front storage compartment. If I put the batteries out front, which I can't on tongue weight, I'd have absolutely no ability to use the storage compartment.
Thus, about half the weight of the batteries placed in the storage compartment (~140 lbs) would retain the same balance as from the factory. I expect I'll end up with more weight in there than that.
But, I do accept that the placement of weight out back will add to sway...looking for an alternative...over the wheels is obviously ideal...but it's pretty busy around there and interior/unventilated.
|
|
|
04-04-2017, 02:00 PM
|
#12
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Northern KY
Posts: 5,725
|
I think there may be some, including me that might think that because all of that weight is concentrated at the ends of the frame might cause a problem, certainly sway, but maybe torque on the frame. Adding weight to the trailer in a more linear fashion, distributed equally along the entire length of the trailer I think would be better.
Maybe two batteries up front and two in the rear? Connected with a #10 or 8 gauge wire should suffice for equalizing currents, and that would give you 12 V connections both front and back.
__________________
"nothing can now be believed which is seen in a newspaper. Truth itself becomes suspicious by being put into that polluted vehicle."
Thomas Jefferson to John Norvell pg. 2, June 11, 1807
2014 Shamrock 183
2014 RAM 1500 Bighorn Crew Cab, HEMI, 3.21 gears, 8 Spd, 4X4 TST TPMS
|
|
|
04-04-2017, 02:00 PM
|
#13
|
Site Team
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Goodyear, Arizona
Posts: 33,855
|
Plus the rear end will bounce way more than the Aframe, when towing.
__________________
Dan-Retired California Firefighter/EMT
Shawn-Musician/Entrepreneur/Wine Expert
and Zoe the Wonder Dog(R.I.P.)
2016 PrimeTime TracerAIR 255, pushing a 2014 Ford F150 SCREW XTR 4x4 3.5 Ecoboost w/Max Tow Package
4pt Equal-i-zer WDH and 1828lbs of payload capacity
|
|
|
04-04-2017, 02:12 PM
|
#14
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 5,061
|
I did a search on your trailer. Saw a 2014 unit for sale from a Florida Auction site that was equipped with a drop down tray over the back bumper that looks to be attached directly to the frame. That might be a viable support mechanism. Bolting to the bumper, maybe not - how strong is the square tube bumper tube and how well is it welded onto the frame? Lots of reports of bumpers falling off trailers when people bolt extra stuff to them (look at some of the threads about adding a bike rack).
You are doing the right engineering work - looking at what weight you are putting where. Replacing weight of the batteries with other stuff is reasonable. According to common knowledge, lower tongue weight, near or below 10% of total trailer weight raises risk of sway. Related question - what are you using for a hitch? How good is the anti-sway on it?
Additional to your checking weight balance, what is the total weight of the trailer at project completion? Are you still safely under the axle and tire weight ratings of the trailer and the trailer GVW? Are you still safely under your GCVW? Will you be balanced left/right - don't overload one side of the trailer.
Running the wiring is just something to work out, make sure you are using appropriate gauge wire, possibly one size larger to reduce loss. You might just run some conduit under the trailer to protect the wiring. I note the FR just ran the wires for my brakes across the axle with a few wire ties - totally exposed. Apparently this is common practice!
You might check with some of your state motor vehicle people about legal issues of putting the batteries back there. Personally, it is probably a relatively low risk. If you get hit, it may splash some battery acid, but they won't explode. I have seen Jeeps with jerrycans for gas on the back of the vehicle which I would argue has a high fire risk.
__________________
Al
I am starting to think, that I will never be old enough--------to know better.
Tolerance will reach such a level that intelligent people will be banned from thinking so as not to offend the imbeciles. Fyodor Mikhailovich Dostoevsky, Russian Novelist
S.E. Mich. Flagstaff 26FKWS / 2022 F-150 3.5 EcoBoost SCrew Propride
|
|
|
04-04-2017, 02:20 PM
|
#15
|
"Curmudgeon"
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Zebulon, NC, NC
Posts: 289
|
Don't know about your rig, but Forest River says don't put anything on the bumper--too flimsy.
|
|
|
04-04-2017, 06:53 PM
|
#16
|
Canadian Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Eastern GTA, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 6,238
|
AB_SP295BHS, correct me if I'm wrong on these numbers that I found doing an internet search ...
Your Durango has a 5.7L engine, a wheelbase of 120 inches, a payload capacity of about 1340 pounds and a max. towing capacity of about 7400 pounds.
Your Surveyor SP295BHS is 33' long with a "dry weight" of around 6000 pounds.
__________________
2023 Rockwood Signature 8262RBS
2016 Ford F-250 XLT SuperCrew, 6.2L, 4x4, 6'9" bed
2019 Rockwood Signature 8290BS (2019 - 2022)
2011 Rockwood Signature 8293SS (2015 - 2018)
2010 Rockwood Roo 23SS (2012 - 2014)
|
|
|
04-04-2017, 06:55 PM
|
#17
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Media, PA
Posts: 2,932
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trawlerphil
Don't know about your rig, but Forest River says don't put anything on the bumper--too flimsy.
|
I recall reading a few posts where people complained about poor construction of trailers when their bumpers fell off or bent. The complainers all added weight to those bumpers, disregarding manufacturers warnings.
__________________
2017 Dynamax REV 24RB
2018 Ford F-150
Formerly a 2013 Sunseeker 2250 SLEC.
|
|
|
04-04-2017, 07:07 PM
|
#18
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Virginia
Posts: 9,939
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by itat
AB_SP295BHS, correct me if I'm wrong on these numbers that I found doing an internet search ...
Your Durango has a 5.7L engine, a wheelbase of 120 inches, a payload capacity of about 1340 pounds and a max. towing capacity of about 7400 pounds.
Your Surveyor SP295BHS is 33' long with a "dry weight" of around 6000 pounds.
|
If this is the case the trailer / vehicle combination is at or over max capacity before adding more batteries. Take it to the scales loaded for camping and weigh it.
Either way I would leave the batteries at the front for the safety of your family and others.
__________________
2005 Dodge 3500 Cummins
2017 Wildwood Lodge 4092 BFL
1966 Mustang GT
1986 Mustang SVO
Lillie Spoiled Rotten Boxer Mix
|
|
|
04-04-2017, 07:22 PM
|
#19
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: KS
Posts: 2,369
|
Cannot speak to the bumper being able to support the weight but there are several Volvo and BMW SUVs that have batteries in the back. They are behind a bumper and not on it but in the back. There are also lots of hybrid cars with batteries in the trunk. I don't think there is a legal issue...maybe safety if there is nothing between them and air.
|
|
|
04-04-2017, 07:37 PM
|
#20
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Big brown desert
Posts: 3,003
|
Relocate batteries to rear bumper
But the difference with those vehicles with standard batteries and hybrid is that they are CRASH TESTED to provide safety to all involved.
I think that the rear sway you might pick up would make it the scariest decision ever. I had a professional weld in a hitch and proper supports then went and put 150 pounds on it. TW was 450 before I did that. Got on the freeway and almost lost it immediately. Don't know how kept it together. And I was alone for that trip. Do you want your family in the truck now?
__________________
2014 Stealth Evo 2850- "Woodstock"
2011 Toyota Tundra Rock Crawler TRD 5.7- "Clifford"
2013 Honda Accord Coupe V6 w/Track Pack- "Julia"
Just glad to get away
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|