Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-17-2013, 10:04 AM   #1
Senior Member
 
Roll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 480
My pathetic fuel numbers for 2013

Putting the coach away now until spring 2014.

We drove 2,621 miles (odometer reads 10,851 now)
We purchased 465.886 gallons of regular gasoline
We paid an average of $3.42 per gallon or ($1,593.35 for the season)
We averaged a whopping 5.62 miles per gallon of gasoline.


We towed the 4 dr Jeep (4,012 pounds) most of the time; plus the coach is fairly loaded with all the stuff we might need including a robust set of tools.

I do fill the tank before I put it away so that includes the cost of the last fill-up. It was full when I opened it up this spring and I did not include that fuel bill.

I'm dismayed at the weak showing on miles per gallon but would have guessed the total cost of gas for the season would have exceeded $1600.

Gary
__________________
Gary, Cindy, Reacher (Maine Coon), and Vivian (in spirit only now).
Retired: July 31st, 2013 and loving it.
__________________________________________
2011 Coachmen Encounter 37 TZ pulling a 2018 Wrangler Unlimited Sahara (JKUS). Many upgrades, additions, mods, and changes to the coach.
Roll is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2013, 11:08 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
bend302's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Bronston, KY
Posts: 734
Hmmmmmmmm

I have a 2005 Georgetown XL on a Ford chassis and get close to 7MPG towing a 4000# Honda Accord (old 2000).

I drive between 55 and 62 MPH, use cruise control as much as possible with generally no real extensive hills except through TN And AL going to FL.

I think the real issue is speed and finding the "sweet" spot for the engine.

Bill
__________________

Life is a journey, not a destination.
2005 Georgetown 359ts
Bill & Virginia, Kentucky
Nights camped in 2011...78 , 2012...73,
Nights camped in 2013...123, 2014 ...101
bend302 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2013, 11:23 AM   #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 237
gas mileage and rv should not be in the same sentence. the only way to get good mileage in an rv is not to have one.
gerrym51 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2013, 01:50 PM   #4
Member
 
statgeek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 46
MPG common error in calculations

Roll--
With all due respect, you are doing the math wrong, but don't feel bad because it is a very a common mistake too. As my username implies, I am a statistician, so please let me explain :

The usual MPG formula is assumed to be... MPG = miles traveled / gallons used.

This is what we all have done long before we started to drive RV's and tow vehicles, and it has always arrived at the right answer. That, however, is only because there is an invisible parameter in this calculation that, it turns out, does not affect the calculation when you are performing a MPG calculation for an automobile. But...when performing the calculation for an RV pulling a toad, this parameter is no longer insignificant.

The TRUE formula should be MPG = (Miles traveled/gallons used) X vehicles delivered to site.

Since you are an RV towing a toad, that last parameter = 2. Thus your calculation of 5.62 MPG is an underestimate by a factor of two. Your "true" MPG when you factor in the number of vehicles delivered to site is 2 X 5.62 = 11.24.

There... I'm sure you feel better now, right?
statgeek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2013, 02:28 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
Roll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 480
Quote:
Originally Posted by bend302 View Post
Hmmmmmmmm

I have a 2005 Georgetown XL on a Ford chassis and get close to 7MPG towing a 4000# Honda Accord (old 2000).

I drive between 55 and 62 MPH, use cruise control as much as possible with generally no real extensive hills except through TN And AL going to FL.

I think the real issue is speed and finding the "sweet" spot for the engine.

Bill
I don't know where the sweet spot is but I keep the coach in the 55 to 60 range; sometimes as high as 64 but that's as high as I like to go. We did a lot of steep grades this year in PA and in Ohio but it wasn't all up and down.

Gary
__________________
Gary, Cindy, Reacher (Maine Coon), and Vivian (in spirit only now).
Retired: July 31st, 2013 and loving it.
__________________________________________
2011 Coachmen Encounter 37 TZ pulling a 2018 Wrangler Unlimited Sahara (JKUS). Many upgrades, additions, mods, and changes to the coach.
Roll is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2013, 02:31 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 168
I tend to agree - speed is the key - how to find your sweet spot. Buy yourself a Scangauge. I found 55-60 to deliver in 9s - no Toad but never find myself driving that slow. I stay around 60-65 and seem to see 7s now. My first tank 65-70 and pushing it was 6.2 which disappointed me. End of the day...it all rolls into the cost of doing business and the projected over night costs versus a hotel room.
__________________
Mickey Alberto
2020 F350 4X4 6.7 CCLB, SRW
2020 Heartland Elkridge 38MB
cmalberto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2013, 02:31 PM   #7
Mod free 5er
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Concord, NC
Posts: 24,702
Quote:
Originally Posted by statgeek View Post
Roll--
With all due respect, you are doing the math wrong, but don't feel bad because it is a very a common mistake too. As my username implies, I am a statistician, so please let me explain... Your "true" MPG when you factor in the number of vehicles delivered to site is 2 X 5.62 = 11.24.

There... I'm sure you feel better now, right?
And you know the old saying, "figures don't lie, but ... figure" Just like the folks in Washington, DC.
__________________
OldCoot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2013, 02:31 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
Iwannacamp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 7,916
I suggest trying a Schaeffers product called neutra. It is a gas and diesel treatment. Find some..buy it..use it..recheck your mileage.
__________________
2017 Puma 297RLSS
2005 Ram 2500 4X4 diesel SMOKER!!
I love puns, irony and tasteless jokes...
born in Texas.... live in Arkansas
Iwannacamp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2013, 02:32 PM   #9
Senior Member
 
Roll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 480
Quote:
Originally Posted by statgeek View Post
Roll--
With all due respect, you are doing the math wrong, but don't feel bad because it is a very a common mistake too. As my username implies, I am a statistician, so please let me explain :

The usual MPG formula is assumed to be... MPG = miles traveled / gallons used.

This is what we all have done long before we started to drive RV's and tow vehicles, and it has always arrived at the right answer. That, however, is only because there is an invisible parameter in this calculation that, it turns out, does not affect the calculation when you are performing a MPG calculation for an automobile. But...when performing the calculation for an RV pulling a toad, this parameter is no longer insignificant.

The TRUE formula should be MPG = (Miles traveled/gallons used) X vehicles delivered to site.

Since you are an RV towing a toad, that last parameter = 2. Thus your calculation of 5.62 MPG is an underestimate by a factor of two. Your "true" MPG when you factor in the number of vehicles delivered to site is 2 X 5.62 = 11.24.

There... I'm sure you feel better now, right?

LOL

Well using your assumption, my mileage was actually better than you indicate since if the Jeep was traveling independent of the Coach it would be getting in the range of 18 to 21 miles a gallon meaning that in reality, when the DW and I arrived at our destination, the Jeep continued on to a campground another 50 miles down the road. Makes using the Jeep somewhat problematic but who cares when your miles per gallon looks so good!

Gary

PS Thanks for the laugh statgeek.
__________________
Gary, Cindy, Reacher (Maine Coon), and Vivian (in spirit only now).
Retired: July 31st, 2013 and loving it.
__________________________________________
2011 Coachmen Encounter 37 TZ pulling a 2018 Wrangler Unlimited Sahara (JKUS). Many upgrades, additions, mods, and changes to the coach.
Roll is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2013, 02:36 PM   #10
Mod free 5er
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Concord, NC
Posts: 24,702
And if you really want to feel good do a weight carried/mile/gal of fuel.
__________________
OldCoot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2013, 02:59 PM   #11
Member
 
statgeek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 46
Quote:
Originally Posted by OldCoot View Post
And if you really want to feel good do a weight carried/mile/gal of fuel.
Oh this is great idea!! I may have to work something up on that one!!
__________________
2013 Fleetwood Discovery 40G
BlueOx Aventa & Patriot Braking System
2009 Jeep Wrangler Unlimited
statgeek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2013, 03:46 PM   #12
Senior Member
 
1nshort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Annapolis Area
Posts: 252
Roll,

I only did 2600 miles but pulled a toad at 3400 pounds. Speed between 60-65 MPH. Averaged between 6.5-7.2 MPG. I did not include one tank where I ran the genset for several hours which yielded 5.4 MPG. If you ran your genset figure hours times 7.5 gallons and add that back into you gallons total and recalculate your MPG.
Coach in shop for roof panel popping up about halfway back of front AC unit from the unit to roof edge possible delam.

Denis
__________________
2013 Encounter 37TZ, Chalet Pkg, Escape Hybrid Toad,
Denis & Gail & Dixie the Blue Merle Sheltie
1nshort is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2013, 03:51 PM   #13
Senior Member
 
1nshort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Annapolis Area
Posts: 252
Make that hours times .75 gallons
__________________
2013 Encounter 37TZ, Chalet Pkg, Escape Hybrid Toad,
Denis & Gail & Dixie the Blue Merle Sheltie
1nshort is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2013, 06:52 PM   #14
Senior Member
 
Roll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 480
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1nshort View Post
Make that hours times .75 gallons
I'm not happy to hear about your roof. Please advise what they find.

Seriously? The Gen burns 3/4 of a gallon an hour? I thought it sipped gasoline.

Gary
__________________
Gary, Cindy, Reacher (Maine Coon), and Vivian (in spirit only now).
Retired: July 31st, 2013 and loving it.
__________________________________________
2011 Coachmen Encounter 37 TZ pulling a 2018 Wrangler Unlimited Sahara (JKUS). Many upgrades, additions, mods, and changes to the coach.
Roll is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2013, 07:38 PM   #15
Senior Member
 
1nshort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Annapolis Area
Posts: 252
gen gas, roof

I
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roll View Post
I'm not happy to hear about your roof. Please advise what they find.

Seriously? The Gen burns 3/4 of a gallon an hour? I thought it sipped gasoline.

Gary
I have a 7500 watt gen for the house. At 50% load it gets 7-8 hours on a 5 gallon tank. The genset on the coach is 5.5 kwatts, very similar. Going down the road ( or parked) I am running both A.C.s, uses a bit of gas. Since there is no real documentation on the consumption of the unit, only 'word of mouth', I am using it as a comparison.

Yeah, I am concerned too (about the roof), John Vrydrags of Coachmen/Forrest River was quick to respond on it, now if I could just get the dealership motivated. I discovered/reported it 2 days before my 1 year was up. So you can guess I am nervous on this one. Winnebago has a 10 year roof waranty and Thor has a 2 year TPO roof waranty. it is best you check your whole roof perimeter caulking seal every 6 months. Looking at the factory caulk job, it is really cheap and of low grade for bead width. I would have caulked at 4 times their width. I was up on the roof inspecting the automatic satellite antenna install when I discovered it.

Denis
__________________
2013 Encounter 37TZ, Chalet Pkg, Escape Hybrid Toad,
Denis & Gail & Dixie the Blue Merle Sheltie
1nshort is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2013, 07:57 PM   #16
Grape Escape
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Southern Ontario
Posts: 774
My Honda CRV which weighs approx 3500# might get 28 mpg highway and less in city.
My 24,000# motorhome gets around 7mpg towing the CRV. In my mind it's the equivilent of 32mpg. Not bad in my mind
Not complaining
__________________
2008 Cardinal 30RKLE 5th wheel sold
2006 Rockwood 2607, 2001 Traillite
55 nights 2009, 53 for 2010
44 for 2011, 38 for 2012, 35 for 2013, 51 for 2014
dezolen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2013, 09:17 PM   #17
Senior Member
 
Dodge Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,648
What chassis is it Ford V-10 or GM 8.1L? I had the same issue with my Excursion with the V-10. after trying everything I found out the problem was the ethanol in the fuel. I was running 87 octane and it lost a lot of mileage and power. on one of our trips I ran 93 and the power and mileage almost completely returned. the ethanol will kill the octane rating of the fuel meaning it has less BTU`s. during one trip before I ran the 93 octane I could barley hold 55 with a slight headwind and was getting 5 MPG!!!! and at the same time because the pedal was on the floor it was unlocking the TC causing the trans to run hot. I had to slow down to let it go into O/D to let the trans cool off. just this past year I ordered a 5 star programmer which changes the shift strategy, TC lock up, shift pressures, and other parameters. all this adds approx. 20HP. it can be ordered in 87, 89 or 93 octane tunes. they are highly recommended! my X feels like a completely different truck and am completely happy I went with it.
__________________
2012 Georgetown XL 350TS, Hellwig front/rear sway bars, Sumo Springs, Blue OX True Center steering damper
2013 Ford Explorer LTD toad, Roadmaster Stowmaster 5000, VIP><Tow Brake

Better to have a bad day of camping than a good day at work!
Dodge Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2013, 06:29 AM   #18
Senior Member
 
Roll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 480
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dodge Guy View Post
What chassis is it Ford V-10 or GM 8.1L? I had the same issue with my Excursion with the V-10. after trying everything I found out the problem was the ethanol in the fuel. I was running 87 octane and it lost a lot of mileage and power. on one of our trips I ran 93 and the power and mileage almost completely returned. the ethanol will kill the octane rating of the fuel meaning it has less BTU`s. during one trip before I ran the 93 octane I could barley hold 55 with a slight headwind and was getting 5 MPG!!!! and at the same time because the pedal was on the floor it was unlocking the TC causing the trans to run hot. I had to slow down to let it go into O/D to let the trans cool off. just this past year I ordered a 5 star programmer which changes the shift strategy, TC lock up, shift pressures, and other parameters. all this adds approx. 20HP. it can be ordered in 87, 89 or 93 octane tunes. they are highly recommended! my X feels like a completely different truck and am completely happy I went with it.
I have the 2011 Ford Chassis with the Triton V-10. I have a tune as well, though my tune is from Brazels. I do run 87 octane regular. So your suggestion is that I try a tank of 93 and compare mileage?

Gary
__________________
Gary, Cindy, Reacher (Maine Coon), and Vivian (in spirit only now).
Retired: July 31st, 2013 and loving it.
__________________________________________
2011 Coachmen Encounter 37 TZ pulling a 2018 Wrangler Unlimited Sahara (JKUS). Many upgrades, additions, mods, and changes to the coach.
Roll is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2013, 03:01 PM   #19
Senior Member
 
1nshort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Annapolis Area
Posts: 252
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roll View Post

I have the 2011 Ford Chassis with the Triton V-10. I have a tune as well, though my tune is from Brazels. I do run 87 octane regular. So your suggestion is that I try a tank of 93 and compare mileage?

Gary
If your tune is for 87 octane you will have to get a tune for 93 octane before using it or retro back to your original tune or you could do damage to the engine. That is what my tune warned me about when I bought my 87 octane tune.

Denis
__________________
2013 Encounter 37TZ, Chalet Pkg, Escape Hybrid Toad,
Denis & Gail & Dixie the Blue Merle Sheltie
1nshort is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2013, 11:34 PM   #20
Senior Member
 
Dodge Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,648
Ya, I would run the 93 with the stock tune, although I don`t see an issue with running 93 with your 87 tune! definitely try 1 tank and see how it does/feels!
__________________
2012 Georgetown XL 350TS, Hellwig front/rear sway bars, Sumo Springs, Blue OX True Center steering damper
2013 Ford Explorer LTD toad, Roadmaster Stowmaster 5000, VIP><Tow Brake

Better to have a bad day of camping than a good day at work!
Dodge Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
2013

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


» Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by

Disclaimer:

This website is not affiliated with or endorsed by Forest River, Inc. or any of its affiliates. This is an independent, unofficial site.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:34 AM.