Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-30-2012, 01:43 PM   #1
Junior Member
 
Kalacim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Detroit
Posts: 11
Roo 183 tow vehicle ??

Hello,

Long time reader but my first post.

I am looking at my specs and would like some input on them. I have a 2011 Ecoboost F150 pulling a Roo 183, here goes

Weights

F150 5,688 #'s Ecoboost 3.5L with 3.55 standard 18's for tires
Roo 4,500 #' loaded - Dry is around 3,300 #'s so I am estimating for gear
Total is 10,188
GCVW is 15,500

Payload

Truck payload is 1512 from the sticker
If I take 374 for hitch weight plus 300#'s for Me and wife + 110 for children)Est high they are little) plus WDH 100#'s that leaves me with about 1,000#'s of payload left.

Does this sound like a safe and confortable setup?
Kalacim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2012, 02:31 PM   #2
Site Team
 
bikendan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Goodyear, Arizona
Posts: 33,789
If you've got an Ecoboost with tow package, there's no hybrid made that it can't tow easily.
Even fully loaded.
So, get a good WDH and go camping!
__________________
Dan-Retired California Firefighter/EMT
Shawn-Musician/Entrepreneur/Wine Expert
and Zoe the Wonder Dog(R.I.P.)
2016 PrimeTime TracerAIR 255, pushing a 2014 Ford F150 SCREW XTR 4x4 3.5 Ecoboost w/Max Tow Package
4pt Equal-i-zer WDH and 1828lbs of payload capacity
bikendan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2012, 02:36 PM   #3
Junior Member
 
Kalacim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Detroit
Posts: 11
The dealer installed a Husky 600/6,000 WDH and it works well I have no problem with setup. I have nothing to compare other WDH's to so I cannot say if I am having a good/bad towing experience.

However I moved from a Dodge 1500 with the 4.7 without the tow package and it could not pull this trailer at 60 MPH. The RAM was running at 5000 RPM at 60 which is why I moved to the ECOBoost to begin with.

The EcoBoost has been great so far even at 10 MPG or so pulling. I think the MPG has more to do with Frontal area opposed to weight.
Kalacim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2012, 06:20 AM   #4
Junior Member
 
Darnutz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 18
Kalacim. If you are interested in understanding your weight restrictions and such you can check out my recent post on a thread titled tv's for Roo 23ss. It's elaborate and if you h e any other questions feel free to contact me. I was all worried about information on this and made sure I understood everything now.
Darnutz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2012, 09:34 AM   #5
Site Team
 
bikendan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Goodyear, Arizona
Posts: 33,789
Darnutz, the OP has a Roo 183, a much smaller, shorter and lighter hybrid than the 23SS.

therefore, an Ecoboost will have no problem towing it nor any hybrid made.
__________________
Dan-Retired California Firefighter/EMT
Shawn-Musician/Entrepreneur/Wine Expert
and Zoe the Wonder Dog(R.I.P.)
2016 PrimeTime TracerAIR 255, pushing a 2014 Ford F150 SCREW XTR 4x4 3.5 Ecoboost w/Max Tow Package
4pt Equal-i-zer WDH and 1828lbs of payload capacity
bikendan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2012, 10:33 AM   #6
Moderator Emeritus
 
acadianbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: St. Paul, Minnesota
Posts: 3,367
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kalacim View Post
Does this sound like a safe and confortable setup?
No sweat!! Safe and happy camping!!
__________________
https://i421.photobucket.com/albums/pp297/acadianbob/IMG_2757.jpg
2021 F350 Lariat 7.3 4X4 w 4.30s, 2018 Wildcat 29RLX
2012 BMW G650GS, Demco Premiere Slider
1969 John Deere 1020, 1940 Ford 9N, 1948 Ford 8N
Jonsered 535, Can of WD-40, Duct Tape
Red Green coffee mugs
acadianbob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2012, 12:16 PM   #7
Junior Member
 
Darnutz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 18
I'm familiar with that. Just put it out there to anyone breaking a sweat over their weights. Just a better understanding of ones limits. That Eco boost should actually be able to tow my trailer with a lot more ease
Darnutz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2012, 12:25 PM   #8
Junior Member
 
Kalacim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Detroit
Posts: 11
I was not terribly worried about weight but more about the gas milage that I am getting. The 183 seems to be a huge wind block when towing. I wanted to make sure weight was not the issue but more a frontal area problem. Has anyone noticed or found a way to divert the air coming over the truck, to up and over the camper?
Kalacim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2012, 12:33 PM   #9
Moderator Emeritus
 
Triguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Southeast Wisconsin
Posts: 6,949
The bottom line is gas mileage is what it is. Driving 55mph helps the most IMHO.

Wind deflectors need to be really well adjusted to make any appreciable difference. I read more negatives than positives on the various forums I visit.
__________________
Scott
DW, 3 Kids and our Goldens

2012 Shamrock 233S
2008 Toyota Sequoia 5.7L 4WD
Triguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2012, 01:39 PM   #10
Junior Member
 
Kalacim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Detroit
Posts: 11
The problem with 2011 Ecoboost is the gas tank is only 26 gallons. Sure would be nice to get a few more miles out of it while towing. I should have waited for the 2012 they put the 36 gallon in as an option, but I could not wait that long.
Kalacim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2012, 01:56 PM   #11
Moderator Emeritus
 
Triguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Southeast Wisconsin
Posts: 6,949
36 gallons would be nice. I have a 26 gallon, too, and the most that can be said for that is it forces me to stop periodically and stretch my legs.

Would you consider an in-bed auxiliary fuel tank? Not sure how important this is to you for the expense and loss of cargo space.
__________________
Scott
DW, 3 Kids and our Goldens

2012 Shamrock 233S
2008 Toyota Sequoia 5.7L 4WD
Triguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2012, 01:59 PM   #12
Junior Member
 
Kalacim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Detroit
Posts: 11
I never considered it. That might just be an option but depending on the size it could cost quite a bit for a one time stop at the gas station. But I would have to pay either way.
Kalacim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2012, 06:26 PM   #13
Member
 
Canuck_Doug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Oakville, ON
Posts: 32
I would love an F150 eco-boost to pull my 183, but I have to settle for my 06 Explorer EB with the 4.6 and tow package..... Pulls no problem, and the gas needle moves easily...
__________________
Doug

2006 Ford Explorer Eddie Bauer
2012 R00 183
delivered 2 Sep 2011

2012 nights camped = 27
2011 nights camped = 22
Canuck_Doug is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


» Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by

Disclaimer:

This website is not affiliated with or endorsed by Forest River, Inc. or any of its affiliates. This is an independent, unofficial site.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:56 AM.