Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-30-2013, 10:12 PM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 5
Question Why the Difference?

I have been looking at the Rockwood HW296 and the Flagstaff HW29SC high wall pop ups online. I currently have a 1989 Coleman Sierra model pop up, and I am in the curiosity stage of what is out there currently. It seems like here on the western side of the U.S., Flagstaff is the more available model carried by RV dealers over the Rockwood. I'm perplexed by one noticeable difference, and a bit confused as to why the difference is there.

Between the two models, everything is identical in their specs (weight, box size, floor plans and options, towing weight, etc). But I notice that the Rockwood model is a double axle while the Flagstaff model is only a single axle. Why the difference, and does it make a difference on pulling, balance, and stability?

I'd appreciate anyone's thoughts about this... just curious why they wouldn't be identical in this area, and if it is a big deal.
cwenzel70 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2013, 08:43 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
w4drr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Roanoke, VA
Posts: 233
Are you looking at pictures on dealer sites? They may be slipping in a picture of a 27 instead of a 29. My understanding is, the only real difference between the Rockwood HW296 and Flagstaff HW29SC is interior decor, at least that is how it was when I was researching them last year. To carry that much GVW on a single axle would require a considerable upgrade on the tires and axle.
__________________
Bob & Doris
Roanoke, VA
2009 Toyota Tundra CrewMax 4x4 - 5.7L - 6 Speed Auto - 4.30:1
2013 Rockwood HW296
w4drr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2013, 09:06 PM   #3
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 5
I was looking on the Forest River website, checking on both the Flagstaff and Rockwood links. The online brochure pics show the difference. I would think the double axle would make more sense simply because of the point you make about weight.
cwenzel70 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2013, 09:17 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Twisty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,137
Seems to me it would be a printing or editing mistake.
The dealer pics of units on the lot show tandem axles.
__________________
FOR SALE 2014 BOSS 6.2L F350
2012 Surveyor SV264
NW Oregon
Twisty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2013, 09:34 PM   #5
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 5
That's what I'm thinking, since I just saw an 09 Flagstaff high side with a tandem axle posted for sale in one of the forum
cwenzel70 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2013, 09:39 PM   #6
Site Team
 
bikendan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Goodyear, Arizona
Posts: 33,802
they are the same exact trailer. only difference is outside graphics and interior decor patterns.

this is true for all the Rockwood/Flagstaff RV's. TT's, HTT's, 5th wheels and popups.
same factory and same assembly lines.
__________________
Dan-Retired California Firefighter/EMT
Shawn-Musician/Entrepreneur/Wine Expert
and Zoe the Wonder Dog(R.I.P.)
2016 PrimeTime TracerAIR 255, pushing a 2014 Ford F150 SCREW XTR 4x4 3.5 Ecoboost w/Max Tow Package
4pt Equal-i-zer WDH and 1828lbs of payload capacity
bikendan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2013, 09:34 AM   #7
Senior Member
 
w4drr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Roanoke, VA
Posts: 233
I checked out the Flagstaff brochure, and the High Wall they show is a HW27KS, not the HW29SC. It even says so on page 6, in the lower left corner of the interior shot. I think that may have been a marketing decision because the HW27KS seems to be a more popular model, possibly due to it's sub-4000# towing weight, making it more towable for small/mid-size SUVs and maybe even high-end minivans.
__________________
Bob & Doris
Roanoke, VA
2009 Toyota Tundra CrewMax 4x4 - 5.7L - 6 Speed Auto - 4.30:1
2013 Rockwood HW296
w4drr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2013, 12:58 PM   #8
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 5
Ahhhh, now I see that... thanks for the clarification.
cwenzel70 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2013, 01:12 PM   #9
daydreaming about camping
 
jeeplj8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: KC area
Posts: 1,404
yep - you have to be careful with what model appears in a picture.

Sometimes they just make it up.

For example, the 2013 Coachmen Freedom Express catalog has what was supposed to be a 320BHDS (my camper, so I noticed) on the cover, but in the artists rendering they put the wrong bunk/kitchen combo in. no such camper exists.
__________________

2013 Coachmen Freedom Express 320BHDS pulled by a 2005 F250 King Ranch CC

A rainy day camping is better than a sunny day at work.
jeeplj8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2013, 08:04 AM   #10
Incheon, S. Korea
 
BigBaron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Incheon, South Korea
Posts: 1,142
Also be careful of the dimensions. I bought our trailer because the dinette area is shown as being 70" long. We planned on our daughter sleeping there.

It's more like 64", and already too small...
__________________
Me, Julie, Lil' Barry, Faith, and OSD Fang
2012 Coachmen Clipper 126 - Don't even have a TV anymore.
I don't know when we'll be able to go camping again...
BigBaron is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


» Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by

Disclaimer:

This website is not affiliated with or endorsed by Forest River, Inc. or any of its affiliates. This is an independent, unofficial site.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:23 PM.